A nationwide mapping of services for high users of emergency departments in England: observational study
AIMS AND METHOD: Services for people who are high users of emergency departments (EDs) have developed in a piecemeal fashion, including those embedded within liaison mental health services, over the past decade. We conducted a national survey of all 171 National Health Service hospitals in England with an ED to identify high user services, alongside 20 interviews from exemplar services to characterise the interventions offered. RESULTS: We had a 100% response rate. Of the 171 hospitals, 76 (44%) had a high user service in the ED without designated staff and 71 (42%) offered services with some designated staff time; 10 (6%) had community services, either separate or with hospital outreach; and 14 (8%) had no service. Interviews revealed great variability among services on most parameters, including staffing levels, entry criteria, case-load and types of intervention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is a need for clarity on entry criteria, case-load and types of intervention, to improve consistency and effectiveness of these services to guide decision-making.
Authors
- Kate Welsh
- Gerlinde Pilkington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-0746)
- Christina M. van der Feltz‐Cornelis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-8956)
- Elspeth Guthrie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-6616)
- Christopher Burton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-2431)
- Sonia Saraiva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2305-9246)
- William Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0650-1442)
- Stephanie de‐la‐Haye
- Steven Ariss
- Suzanne Mason
Institutions
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BJPsych Bulletin
- Published
- 2026-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2026.10251
- Primary Topic
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00