Mercury speciation and removal during full-scale biomass–coal cofiring in a 242 MW pulverized-fuel unit

Mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants remain a critical challenge due to the toxicity, volatility, and limited capture efficiency of elemental mercury (Hg⁰) in conventional flue gas cleaning systems. Biomass–coal cofiring has emerged as a cost-effective mitigation strategy; however, its impact on mercury speciation and removal under full-scale operating conditions remains insufficiently quantified. This study presents an industrial-scale assessment of mercury behavior during coal–biomass cofiring in a 242 MW pulverized-fuel power unit equipped with SCR, ESP, and wet flue gas desulfurization. Three multi-day measurement campaigns were conducted under stable and comparable operating conditions, comparing coal-only combustion with cofiring of coal and 10% biomass (mass basis). Mercury concentrations and speciation were determined in fuels, solid residues, and flue gas using continuous online monitoring and mobile speciation analysis. Biomass cofiring reduced stack mercury concentrations from 1.5 ± 0.20 to 0.8 ± 0.12 µg·Nm⁻ 3 and shifted flue gas speciation toward oxidized mercury (Hg 2+ ), enhancing downstream capture efficiency. The results demonstrate that fuel-driven modification of flue gas chemistry governs mercury speciation and process-level removal performance. These findings provide statistically validated full-scale evidence that biomass cofiring enhances intrinsic mercury capture in existing pollution control systems without additional mercury-specific technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.140337
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mercury speciation and removal during full-scale biomass–coal cofiring in a 242 MW pulverized-fuel unit

Mateusz Wałęka, Krzysztof Kogut, Marta Marczak, Karel Borovec et al.
Fuel
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
article

Mercury speciation and removal during full-scale biomass–coal cofiring in a 242 MW pulverized-fuel unit

Mateusz Wałęka, Krzysztof Kogut, Marta Marczak, Karel Borovec, J. Górecki
article en

Abstract

Mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants remain a critical challenge due to the toxicity, volatility, and limited capture efficiency of elemental mercury (Hg⁰) in conventional flue gas cleaning systems. Biomass–coal cofiring has emerged as a cost-effective mitigation strategy; however, its impact on mercury speciation and removal under full-scale operating conditions remains insufficiently quantified. This study presents an industrial-scale assessment of mercury behavior during coal–biomass cofiring in a 242 MW pulverized-fuel power unit equipped with SCR, ESP, and wet flue gas desulfurization. Three multi-day measurement campaigns were conducted under stable and comparable operating conditions, comparing coal-only combustion with cofiring of coal and 10% biomass (mass basis). Mercury concentrations and speciation were determined in fuels, solid residues, and flue gas using continuous online monitoring and mobile speciation analysis. Biomass cofiring reduced stack mercury concentrations from 1.5 ± 0.20 to 0.8 ± 0.12 µg·Nm⁻ 3 and shifted flue gas speciation toward oxidized mercury (Hg 2+ ), enhancing downstream capture efficiency. The results demonstrate that fuel-driven modification of flue gas chemistry governs mercury speciation and process-level removal performance. These findings provide statistically validated full-scale evidence that biomass cofiring enhances intrinsic mercury capture in existing pollution control systems without additional mercury-specific technologies.

FuelVol. 428
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa Staszica, Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.