Experiences and self-reported outcomes of abortion care in Sub-Saharan countries: a mixed methods systematic review

Access to safe abortion remains a public health concern in sub-Saharan countries, where restrictive policies and limited access to quality healthcare contribute to preventable maternal morbidity and mortality related to unsafe abortion. This study synthesised the available evidence on abortion care experiences and self-reported outcomes of people seeking abortion care. And explored the existing tools to assess abortion care experiences and outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We searched eight databases: Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, to include studies published between 1 January 2010 and 18 October 2025. All original (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) studies that focused on induced abortion care and assessed people’s experiences and outcomes of abortion care in SSA were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) data extraction tool and critical appraisal checklist were adapted. We undertook narrative synthesis for data analysis. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023461963. Of 20,180 records retrieved, 35 were eligible for the final review. Eighteen studies reported both experiences and outcomes of abortion care, nine reported abortion care experiences, seven reported abortion care outcomes, and one reported the development of a tool. The included studies identified negative experiences such as delays in obtaining care, stigmatisation, concerns about privacy and confidentiality, misinformation, and overstating risks, as well as psychological and emotional outcomes such as feeling guilt, sadness, and worry about future pregnancies. The findings also showed positive outcomes, including feelings of relief, happiness, and satisfaction with the services received. The review also identified the absence of reliable tools to assess patient-reported experiences and outcomes of abortion care in SSA. People experienced undesirable challenges while receiving abortion care. Despite negative psychological and emotional outcomes, satisfaction with care, relief, and happiness after abortion revealed in this review may indicate that abortion care is supportive in reducing the consequences of unwanted birth, which is not easily accessible in countries with restrictive abortion policies. A lack of validated measurement tools assessing abortion care experiences and outcomes requires the development of tools in this area. People experience various challenges while receiving abortion care due to limited access to safe abortion and abortion-related stigma in sub-Saharan countries. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on abortion care experiences and outcomes and explored the existing tools to assess abortion care experiences and outcomes in sub-Saharan countries. Experiences and outcomes of abortion care were varied, with some facing delays to receive care, stigma, psychological and emotional challenges, while others reported relief and satisfaction with services. This review highlighted a need for reliable tools to measure abortion care experiences and outcomes from the perspectives of patients receiving care, offering actionable insights for improving the safety and quality of abortion care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Population and Nutrition
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-026-01363-1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences and self-reported outcomes of abortion care in Sub-Saharan countries: a mixed methods systematic review

Monique Rose, Zoe Bradfield, Negash Wakgari, Gizachew A. Tessema et al.
Journal of Health Population and Nutrition
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Experiences and self-reported outcomes of abortion care in Sub-Saharan countries: a mixed methods systematic review

Monique Rose, Zoe Bradfield, Negash Wakgari, Gizachew A. Tessema, Ephrem Yohannes, Stuart J. Watson, Delayehu Bekele
article en

Abstract

Access to safe abortion remains a public health concern in sub-Saharan countries, where restrictive policies and limited access to quality healthcare contribute to preventable maternal morbidity and mortality related to unsafe abortion. This study synthesised the available evidence on abortion care experiences and self-reported outcomes of people seeking abortion care. And explored the existing tools to assess abortion care experiences and outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We searched eight databases: Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, to include studies published between 1 January 2010 and 18 October 2025. All original (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) studies that focused on induced abortion care and assessed people’s experiences and outcomes of abortion care in SSA were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) data extraction tool and critical appraisal checklist were adapted. We undertook narrative synthesis for data analysis. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023461963. Of 20,180 records retrieved, 35 were eligible for the final review. Eighteen studies reported both experiences and outcomes of abortion care, nine reported abortion care experiences, seven reported abortion care outcomes, and one reported the development of a tool. The included studies identified negative experiences such as delays in obtaining care, stigmatisation, concerns about privacy and confidentiality, misinformation, and overstating risks, as well as psychological and emotional outcomes such as feeling guilt, sadness, and worry about future pregnancies. The findings also showed positive outcomes, including feelings of relief, happiness, and satisfaction with the services received. The review also identified the absence of reliable tools to assess patient-reported experiences and outcomes of abortion care in SSA. People experienced undesirable challenges while receiving abortion care. Despite negative psychological and emotional outcomes, satisfaction with care, relief, and happiness after abortion revealed in this review may indicate that abortion care is supportive in reducing the consequences of unwanted birth, which is not easily accessible in countries with restrictive abortion policies. A lack of validated measurement tools assessing abortion care experiences and outcomes requires the development of tools in this area. People experience various challenges while receiving abortion care due to limited access to safe abortion and abortion-related stigma in sub-Saharan countries. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on abortion care experiences and outcomes and explored the existing tools to assess abortion care experiences and outcomes in sub-Saharan countries. Experiences and outcomes of abortion care were varied, with some facing delays to receive care, stigma, psychological and emotional challenges, while others reported relief and satisfaction with services. This review highlighted a need for reliable tools to measure abortion care experiences and outcomes from the perspectives of patients receiving care, offering actionable insights for improving the safety and quality of abortion care.

Journal of Health Population and Nutrition
Griffith University (AU), Murdoch University (AU), Curtin University (AU), Ambo University (ET), North Metropolitan Health Service (AU), St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (ET), The University of Adelaide (AU), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.