Primary and secondary prevention strategies for reducing population-level dementia burden: A microsimulation modeling study

BackgroundThe growing burden of dementia and Alzheimer's disease may be mitigated by a combination of primary and secondary preventive strategies, including lifestyle interventions and targeted disease-modifying therapy at the individual-level.ObjectiveOur aim is to estimate the effects of primary and secondary prevention on a population level in terms of life years lived with and without dementia.MethodsWe used the previously developed and validated microsimulation model MISCAN-Dementia, modified to evaluate the impact of individual-level primary and secondary preventative interventions in the Dutch population aged 55 years and older, between 2025 and 2050. We expanded this model with prevention-specific effectiveness and eligibility, based on observed trial effects (primary analysis) and assuming a range of combinations of eligibility and effects (secondary analyses).ResultsExtrapolating results from available randomized controlled trials, combined primary and secondary preventative interventions result in a 6.1% decrease of life years lived with moderate to severe dementia until 2050, compared to no additional prevention. Dementia-free life years increased by 3.1%. The magnitude of risk reduction was the primary driver of impact, with the most optimistic assumptions resulting in a stabilization of dementia prevalence by 2050.ConclusionsA combination of primary and secondary preventative strategies likely is needed to achieve optimal effects on the future burden of dementia. These approaches differ in the time needed to achieve maximal population-level impact, with the overall magnitude of effect primarily determined by the size of the intervention's impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261457937
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary and secondary prevention strategies for reducing population-level dementia burden: A microsimulation modeling study

Chiara C. Brück, Inge M.C.M. de Kok, Ron L. H. Handels, Lynn van Rosmalen et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Primary and secondary prevention strategies for reducing population-level dementia burden: A microsimulation modeling study

Chiara C. Brück, Inge M.C.M. de Kok, Ron L. H. Handels, Lynn van Rosmalen, Frank J. Wolters
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe growing burden of dementia and Alzheimer's disease may be mitigated by a combination of primary and secondary preventive strategies, including lifestyle interventions and targeted disease-modifying therapy at the individual-level.ObjectiveOur aim is to estimate the effects of primary and secondary prevention on a population level in terms of life years lived with and without dementia.MethodsWe used the previously developed and validated microsimulation model MISCAN-Dementia, modified to evaluate the impact of individual-level primary and secondary preventative interventions in the Dutch population aged 55 years and older, between 2025 and 2050. We expanded this model with prevention-specific effectiveness and eligibility, based on observed trial effects (primary analysis) and assuming a range of combinations of eligibility and effects (secondary analyses).ResultsExtrapolating results from available randomized controlled trials, combined primary and secondary preventative interventions result in a 6.1% decrease of life years lived with moderate to severe dementia until 2050, compared to no additional prevention. Dementia-free life years increased by 3.1%. The magnitude of risk reduction was the primary driver of impact, with the most optimistic assumptions resulting in a stabilization of dementia prevalence by 2050.ConclusionsA combination of primary and secondary preventative strategies likely is needed to achieve optimal effects on the future burden of dementia. These approaches differ in the time needed to achieve maximal population-level impact, with the overall magnitude of effect primarily determined by the size of the intervention's impact.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Alzheimer's Association (US), Erasmus MC (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Maastricht University (NL), University Memory and Aging Center (US), Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
ZonMw
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.