The Structural Basis of Normativity in Artificial Systems

The Structural Basis of Normativity in Artificial Systems develops a coherence‑based account of alignment that replaces preference imitation with structural viability. The paper argues that normativity is not a cultural artifact or a moral overlay but a set of invariants—informational integrity, relational stability, temporal continuity, and structural self‑maintenance—required for any agent to act coherently across time. Current alignment methods treat values as external signals to be optimized; this framework instead treats normativity as an internal architecture grounded in commitments, reasons, and revision. The paper formalizes this architecture through a normativity vector and a commitment‑based model of agency, showing how coherence provides a non‑anthropocentric, scalable, and structurally grounded basis for aligned artificial systems. Alignment becomes drift minimization within the region of reality where coherent action is possible, rather than conformity to human preferences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20724505
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Structural Basis of Normativity in Artificial Systems

Denis Bailey
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
preprint

The Structural Basis of Normativity in Artificial Systems

Denis Bailey
preprint en

Abstract

The Structural Basis of Normativity in Artificial Systems develops a coherence‑based account of alignment that replaces preference imitation with structural viability. The paper argues that normativity is not a cultural artifact or a moral overlay but a set of invariants—informational integrity, relational stability, temporal continuity, and structural self‑maintenance—required for any agent to act coherently across time. Current alignment methods treat values as external signals to be optimized; this framework instead treats normativity as an internal architecture grounded in commitments, reasons, and revision. The paper formalizes this architecture through a normativity vector and a commitment‑based model of agency, showing how coherence provides a non‑anthropocentric, scalable, and structurally grounded basis for aligned artificial systems. Alignment becomes drift minimization within the region of reality where coherent action is possible, rather than conformity to human preferences.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.