Trust as an Omnichannel-to-Advocacy Transmission Mechanism in Mandatory Health care Services: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

<ns3:p>Background In Indonesia, omnichannel integration in healthcare is intensifying, yet the psychological mechanisms that convert omnichannel integration into patient advocacy remain insufficiently understood, particularly in mandatory healthcare settings characterised by credence-service properties, high perceived risk, and constrained choice. This study uses the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework to examine brand trust as a mediating mechanism linking omnichannel integration to brand advocacy. Methods Data were collected from 230 patients across three health care facilities in Jakarta and Tangerang through questionnaires validated via forward translation, back translation, face validity, content validity, and pre-testing. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap subsamples, supplemented by cross-loading evaluation, heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) inference, model comparison, and demographic control variables, was used for analysis. Results Omnichannel integration was positively associated with brand trust (β = 0.715; p &lt; 0.001) and brand advocacy (β = 0.671; p &lt; 0.001). However, the direct effect of omnichannel integration on brand advocacy was not significant (β = 0.019; p = 0.793). The indirect effect of brand trust was significant (β = 0.480; 95% confidence interval [0.372, 0.586]), indicating a full mediation pattern (variance accounted for = 96.2%). After controlling for age, gender, and education, core relationships remained stable, and the model explained 46.8% of the variance in brand advocacy. Conclusions These findings suggest that omnichannel integration is primarily associated with patient advocacy in mandatory health care services through trust. However, because this study does not directly compare service contexts, any inference regarding differences from conventional retail should be interpreted cautiously.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.183317.1
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust as an Omnichannel-to-Advocacy Transmission Mechanism in Mandatory Health care Services: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

Rhian Indradewa, Erwin Suryanegara, M. Gunawan Alif, Rina Anindita
F1000Research
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
article

Trust as an Omnichannel-to-Advocacy Transmission Mechanism in Mandatory Health care Services: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

Rhian Indradewa, Erwin Suryanegara, M. Gunawan Alif, Rina Anindita
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background In Indonesia, omnichannel integration in healthcare is intensifying, yet the psychological mechanisms that convert omnichannel integration into patient advocacy remain insufficiently understood, particularly in mandatory healthcare settings characterised by credence-service properties, high perceived risk, and constrained choice. This study uses the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework to examine brand trust as a mediating mechanism linking omnichannel integration to brand advocacy. Methods Data were collected from 230 patients across three health care facilities in Jakarta and Tangerang through questionnaires validated via forward translation, back translation, face validity, content validity, and pre-testing. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap subsamples, supplemented by cross-loading evaluation, heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) inference, model comparison, and demographic control variables, was used for analysis. Results Omnichannel integration was positively associated with brand trust (β = 0.715; p &lt; 0.001) and brand advocacy (β = 0.671; p &lt; 0.001). However, the direct effect of omnichannel integration on brand advocacy was not significant (β = 0.019; p = 0.793). The indirect effect of brand trust was significant (β = 0.480; 95% confidence interval [0.372, 0.586]), indicating a full mediation pattern (variance accounted for = 96.2%). After controlling for age, gender, and education, core relationships remained stable, and the model explained 46.8% of the variance in brand advocacy. Conclusions These findings suggest that omnichannel integration is primarily associated with patient advocacy in mandatory health care services through trust. However, because this study does not directly compare service contexts, any inference regarding differences from conventional retail should be interpreted cautiously.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Universitas Esa Unggul (ID)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust as an Omnichannel-to-Advocacy Transmission Mechanism in Mandatory Health care Services: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia — Rhian Indradewa, Erwin Suryanegara, et al. · F1000Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS