Can desertification reversal alleviate carbon balance pressure in energy-dominated regions? Evidence from asynchronous dynamics between ecological restoration and energy-related carbon emissions

Ecological restoration in global drylands is expected to reverse land degradation and enhance vegetation-based carbon uptake, yet its interaction with expanding energy systems remains insufficiently quantified. Using the Mu Us Sandy Land as a case study, we integrated multi-source gridded datasets from 2000 to 2020 to assess desertification reversal, NPP-based ecological buffering, energy-related CO₂ emissions, and the CO₂-oriented carbon balance pressure index (CBPI). An SPEI-informed spatial Durbin model was used to account for spatial dependence and examine associations and spillover patterns among hydroclimatic variability, desertification dynamics, socioeconomic factors, and CBPI. Results show that 59.78% of the region underwent a nonlinear transition from severe to mild desertification, with widespread non-climatic restoration signals after accounting for hydroclimatic variability. However, ecological buffering and emissions became increasingly decoupled: emissions increased more than ninefold, whereas the increase in vegetation carbon uptake potential accounted for only 31% of concurrent emission growth, indicating a shift toward an emission-dominated carbon-pressure regime. Spatial econometric results indicate that higher desertification intensity was positively associated with local CBPI, while CBPI exhibited strong spatial dependence. In energy-dominated regions, the local association between desertification reversal and CBPI was weakened, whereas spillover associations with adjacent areas were amplified. Overall, desertification reversal enhanced NPP-based ecological buffering but did not keep pace with energy-related CO₂ emissions. Ecological restoration should therefore be interpreted as carbon-pressure risk regulation—reducing exposure to persistent high-CBPI states through landscape stabilization and NPP-based buffering—rather than complete carbon-balance restoration, verified carbon offsetting, or a substitute for emission-side mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115078
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can desertification reversal alleviate carbon balance pressure in energy-dominated regions? Evidence from asynchronous dynamics between ecological restoration and energy-related carbon emissions

Zuxin Xu, Wei Liang, Yingxin Wu, Ning Chen et al.
Ecological Indicators
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
article

Can desertification reversal alleviate carbon balance pressure in energy-dominated regions? Evidence from asynchronous dynamics between ecological restoration and energy-related carbon emissions

Zuxin Xu, Wei Liang, Yingxin Wu, Ning Chen, Zhenguo Wang, Xinzhi Yan
article en

Abstract

Ecological restoration in global drylands is expected to reverse land degradation and enhance vegetation-based carbon uptake, yet its interaction with expanding energy systems remains insufficiently quantified. Using the Mu Us Sandy Land as a case study, we integrated multi-source gridded datasets from 2000 to 2020 to assess desertification reversal, NPP-based ecological buffering, energy-related CO₂ emissions, and the CO₂-oriented carbon balance pressure index (CBPI). An SPEI-informed spatial Durbin model was used to account for spatial dependence and examine associations and spillover patterns among hydroclimatic variability, desertification dynamics, socioeconomic factors, and CBPI. Results show that 59.78% of the region underwent a nonlinear transition from severe to mild desertification, with widespread non-climatic restoration signals after accounting for hydroclimatic variability. However, ecological buffering and emissions became increasingly decoupled: emissions increased more than ninefold, whereas the increase in vegetation carbon uptake potential accounted for only 31% of concurrent emission growth, indicating a shift toward an emission-dominated carbon-pressure regime. Spatial econometric results indicate that higher desertification intensity was positively associated with local CBPI, while CBPI exhibited strong spatial dependence. In energy-dominated regions, the local association between desertification reversal and CBPI was weakened, whereas spillover associations with adjacent areas were amplified. Overall, desertification reversal enhanced NPP-based ecological buffering but did not keep pace with energy-related CO₂ emissions. Ecological restoration should therefore be interpreted as carbon-pressure risk regulation—reducing exposure to persistent high-CBPI states through landscape stabilization and NPP-based buffering—rather than complete carbon-balance restoration, verified carbon offsetting, or a substitute for emission-side mitigation.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 189
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.