The efficacy of blood-derived growth factor source compared to bone-derived growth factor source on bone regeneration in critical-sized rabbit calvarial bone defects

BACKGROUND: The growth factor sources used in alveolar bone regeneration should be practical and at a level that provides maximum benefit and cost effectiveness. Autologous growth factors are easy and practical to obtain in clinical practice, but their effectiveness in bone regeneration should be assessed in vivo studies. The hypothesis of this study was that the contribution of bone derived growth factors source to bone formation is greater than that of blood-derived growth factor source. METHODS: Thirty male New Zealand rabbits were utilized in the experiment. Four defects of 8 mm were organized in the calvarium of each rabbit, and four treatment procedures were implemented: (1) empty defect, (2) autograft and xenograft (3) autograft+xenograft functionalized with growth factors released from autograft (4) autograft+ xenograft with injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF). Rabbits were sacrificed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of healing. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometrically analyses were performed. The statistical difference was evaluated using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. The significance level was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The autograft+xenograft, autograft+xenograft functionalized with growth factors released from autograft and autograft+ xenograft with i-PRF provided comparable bone formation at 4 and 8 weeks. The autograft+xenograft with i-PRF revealed significantly higher new bone formation at 12 weeks compared to that of autograft+xenograft group. (p = 0.016) There was no difference in the new bone formation between autograft+xenograft with i-PRF and autograft+xenograft functionalized with growth factors groups. (p = 0.75) The residual graft remained comparable among treatment groups at all time points. (p = 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The composite graft contains growth factors obtained from i-PRF showed better new bone formation. Both blood and bone-derived growth factor sources can be utilized to functionalize the osteoconductive graft materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08941-z
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The efficacy of blood-derived growth factor source compared to bone-derived growth factor source on bone regeneration in critical-sized rabbit calvarial bone defects

Sefa Burak Çam, Ç. Karaca, Mehmet Alper Çetinkaya, Onur Koç et al.
BMC Oral Health
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

The efficacy of blood-derived growth factor source compared to bone-derived growth factor source on bone regeneration in critical-sized rabbit calvarial bone defects

Sefa Burak Çam, Ç. Karaca, Mehmet Alper Çetinkaya, Onur Koç, Petek Korkusuz, Nuray Er
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growth factor sources used in alveolar bone regeneration should be practical and at a level that provides maximum benefit and cost effectiveness. Autologous growth factors are easy and practical to obtain in clinical practice, but their effectiveness in bone regeneration should be assessed in vivo studies. The hypothesis of this study was that the contribution of bone derived growth factors source to bone formation is greater than that of blood-derived growth factor source. METHODS: Thirty male New Zealand rabbits were utilized in the experiment. Four defects of 8 mm were organized in the calvarium of each rabbit, and four treatment procedures were implemented: (1) empty defect, (2) autograft and xenograft (3) autograft+xenograft functionalized with growth factors released from autograft (4) autograft+ xenograft with injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF). Rabbits were sacrificed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of healing. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometrically analyses were performed. The statistical difference was evaluated using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. The significance level was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The autograft+xenograft, autograft+xenograft functionalized with growth factors released from autograft and autograft+ xenograft with i-PRF provided comparable bone formation at 4 and 8 weeks. The autograft+xenograft with i-PRF revealed significantly higher new bone formation at 12 weeks compared to that of autograft+xenograft group. (p = 0.016) There was no difference in the new bone formation between autograft+xenograft with i-PRF and autograft+xenograft functionalized with growth factors groups. (p = 0.75) The residual graft remained comparable among treatment groups at all time points. (p = 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The composite graft contains growth factors obtained from i-PRF showed better new bone formation. Both blood and bone-derived growth factor sources can be utilized to functionalize the osteoconductive graft materials.

BMC Oral Health
Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.