Polygenic risk score analysis for major depressive disorder in a Chinese cohort: single-phenotype and pathway-based approaches

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a global mental health challenge characterized by high prevalence, disability, and recurrence, with its susceptibility showing substantial polygenic inheritance. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) provide a novel method to explore cumulative polygenic effects on MDD pathogenesis. Methods Initial study inclusion comprised 721 patients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for MDD and 960 healthy controls. Using summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) East Asian cohort for MDD and schizophrenia (SCZ) phenotypes, as well as from the BioBank Japan (BBJ) for insomnia and body mass index (BMI) phenotypes as the base dataset, we performed stringent quality control (QC) on the data using PLINK v1.90. Subsequently, PRSice v2.3.5 with its PRSet function was employed to generate optimal PRSs for the four phenotypes in QC-passed patients and controls, and pathway-specific PRSs based on Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets. Statistical comparisons of PRS differences between MDD patients and healthy controls were conducted using independent two-sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests in R v4.3.0. Furthermore, logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and sex as covariates, were performed to assess associations between phenotypic PRSs, pathway PRSs, and MDD status. Results A significant difference is demonstrated in MDD-PRS between patients and controls (p < 0.001), with a significant logistic prediction model (empirical p = 9.999×10⁻⁵, pseudo-R² = 2.3%). In contrast, cross-phenotype PRS models were not significant. Pathway analysis identified 18, 14, and 13 significant pathway PRSs in the Biological Process, Molecular Function, and Cellular Component GO subsets, respectively. Notably, most pathway PRS models exhibited greater explanatory power than the single-phenotype model. Conclusions These findings support the predictive value of MDD-PRS and highlight how pathway-specific PRS enhances understanding of MDD’s genetic basis, offering insights for future precision medicine approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08589-7
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polygenic risk score analysis for major depressive disorder in a Chinese cohort: single-phenotype and pathway-based approaches

Jinrong Sun, Zhi Xu, Yonggui Yuan, XingLun Dang et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Polygenic risk score analysis for major depressive disorder in a Chinese cohort: single-phenotype and pathway-based approaches

Jinrong Sun, Zhi Xu, Yonggui Yuan, XingLun Dang, Bidan Zhang, Rui Liu, Yufan Cai, Ying Shao, Haiping Tang, Zhijun Zhang, Yang Li, Bingwei Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a global mental health challenge characterized by high prevalence, disability, and recurrence, with its susceptibility showing substantial polygenic inheritance. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) provide a novel method to explore cumulative polygenic effects on MDD pathogenesis. Methods Initial study inclusion comprised 721 patients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for MDD and 960 healthy controls. Using summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) East Asian cohort for MDD and schizophrenia (SCZ) phenotypes, as well as from the BioBank Japan (BBJ) for insomnia and body mass index (BMI) phenotypes as the base dataset, we performed stringent quality control (QC) on the data using PLINK v1.90. Subsequently, PRSice v2.3.5 with its PRSet function was employed to generate optimal PRSs for the four phenotypes in QC-passed patients and controls, and pathway-specific PRSs based on Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets. Statistical comparisons of PRS differences between MDD patients and healthy controls were conducted using independent two-sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests in R v4.3.0. Furthermore, logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and sex as covariates, were performed to assess associations between phenotypic PRSs, pathway PRSs, and MDD status. Results A significant difference is demonstrated in MDD-PRS between patients and controls (p < 0.001), with a significant logistic prediction model (empirical p = 9.999×10⁻⁵, pseudo-R² = 2.3%). In contrast, cross-phenotype PRS models were not significant. Pathway analysis identified 18, 14, and 13 significant pathway PRSs in the Biological Process, Molecular Function, and Cellular Component GO subsets, respectively. Notably, most pathway PRS models exhibited greater explanatory power than the single-phenotype model. Conclusions These findings support the predictive value of MDD-PRS and highlight how pathway-specific PRS enhances understanding of MDD’s genetic basis, offering insights for future precision medicine approaches.

BMC Psychiatry
Jiangsu University (CN), Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province (CN), Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (CN), Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital (CN), Southeast University (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.