REGULATORY SYSTEMS IN INDIA

India incorporated environmental protection measures in the Constitution to implement decisions taken at International Conventions and Conferences. In addition, the Bhopal Gas Tragedy necessitated the Government of India to enact a comprehensive environmental legislation to mitigate externalities. On the basis of these, the Indian Parliament enacted the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. This is an umbrella legislation that consolidated the provisions of the Water Act of 1974 and the Air Act of 1981. Within the framework of the legislation(s), India established Pollution Control Boards (PCBs) in order to prevent, control, and abate environmental pollution. The focus of this article is to evaluate the functioning of PCBs (in particular, the State Pollution Control Board of Andhra Pradesh, and the Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi) in relation to the prevention of externalities. The analysis of the paper is based on primary as well as secondary data. The data has been collected from published and un-published records. Based on the review of these documents, a questionnaire was prepared to obtain the opinion of the officials of PCBs on the functioning of the Boards. The primary emphasis was on the degree to which the objective of improving environmental quality in India has been fulfilled. The inferences drawn from the empirical analysis were then critically evaluated in the light of the theory of regulatory system. This provides insights into the effectiveness of providing incentives to polluters to take precautionary measures. The study reveals that the regulatory system is unable to improve the environmental quality effectively and efficiently because of an increase in its responsibilities, and the absence of deterrence mechanisms within the PCBs for imposing fines against rogue industries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20698720
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REGULATORY SYSTEMS IN INDIA

Bandaru Chandana1*, Dr. Kavali Madhuravani2, V. Ganesh Kumar3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

REGULATORY SYSTEMS IN INDIA

Bandaru Chandana1*, Dr. Kavali Madhuravani2, V. Ganesh Kumar3
article en

Abstract

India incorporated environmental protection measures in the Constitution to implement decisions taken at International Conventions and Conferences. In addition, the Bhopal Gas Tragedy necessitated the Government of India to enact a comprehensive environmental legislation to mitigate externalities. On the basis of these, the Indian Parliament enacted the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. This is an umbrella legislation that consolidated the provisions of the Water Act of 1974 and the Air Act of 1981. Within the framework of the legislation(s), India established Pollution Control Boards (PCBs) in order to prevent, control, and abate environmental pollution. The focus of this article is to evaluate the functioning of PCBs (in particular, the State Pollution Control Board of Andhra Pradesh, and the Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi) in relation to the prevention of externalities. The analysis of the paper is based on primary as well as secondary data. The data has been collected from published and un-published records. Based on the review of these documents, a questionnaire was prepared to obtain the opinion of the officials of PCBs on the functioning of the Boards. The primary emphasis was on the degree to which the objective of improving environmental quality in India has been fulfilled. The inferences drawn from the empirical analysis were then critically evaluated in the light of the theory of regulatory system. This provides insights into the effectiveness of providing incentives to polluters to take precautionary measures. The study reveals that the regulatory system is unable to improve the environmental quality effectively and efficiently because of an increase in its responsibilities, and the absence of deterrence mechanisms within the PCBs for imposing fines against rogue industries.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.