The empathy game: can trust be supported without positive material reciprocity?

The authors introduce a modified version of the Trust Game of Berg et al. (1995) that the authors call the Empathy Game. The Empathy Game eliminates positive material reciprocity as a motivator that can support trust, leaving empathy as the primary possible remaining support. The authors find empathy can support trust. For example, for a Second Mover to be willing to help a First Mover in the authors’ Fixed Cost treatment, the empathy of the Second Mover for the First Mover must outweigh a material cost equal to 13% of Second Mover wealth. Despite this material disincentive, 37 of 60 First Movers (62%) chose to appeal to the empathy of the Second Mover by putting some wealth at risk. In response, Second Movers made the materially costly trustworthy choice in 17 of the 37 cases (or 46% of the time).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Behavioral Economics
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rbe-12-2024-1005
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The empathy game: can trust be supported without positive material reciprocity?

Federico Guerrero, Sourik Banerjee, Mark A. Pingle
Review of Behavioral Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

The empathy game: can trust be supported without positive material reciprocity?

Federico Guerrero, Sourik Banerjee, Mark A. Pingle
article en

Abstract

The authors introduce a modified version of the Trust Game of Berg et al. (1995) that the authors call the Empathy Game. The Empathy Game eliminates positive material reciprocity as a motivator that can support trust, leaving empathy as the primary possible remaining support. The authors find empathy can support trust. For example, for a Second Mover to be willing to help a First Mover in the authors’ Fixed Cost treatment, the empathy of the Second Mover for the First Mover must outweigh a material cost equal to 13% of Second Mover wealth. Despite this material disincentive, 37 of 60 First Movers (62%) chose to appeal to the empathy of the Second Mover by putting some wealth at risk. In response, Second Movers made the materially costly trustworthy choice in 17 of the 37 cases (or 46% of the time).

Review of Behavioral Economics
University of Nevada, Reno (US), California State University, Fresno (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.