Comparative assessment of kV imaging air kerma for intrafraction prostate fiducial monitoring using three clinical systems

PURPOSE: To compare the accumulated kerma-in-air associated with intrafraction fiducial-based prostate localization in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) across three clinical platforms: Varian TrueBeam with AutoBeam Hold (ABH), Varian TrueBeam with Brainlab ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD), and Accuray Radixact with Synchrony. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom containing four gold fiducial markers was used. For each system, the lowest kilovoltage exposure parameters allowing stable automatic fiducial localization were identified. The corresponding kerma-in-air per image was then measured at isocenter using a calibrated dosimetry system. Per-image values were extrapolated to per-fraction and full-course accumulated kerma-in-air estimates based on clinically representative intrafraction monitoring frequencies for prostate SBRT. RESULTS: The mean kerma-in-air per image was 1.47 mGy for TrueBeam ABH, 0.034 mGy for ETD, and 0.15 mGy for Radixact Synchrony. When extrapolated to a five-fraction SBRT regimen, cumulative kerma-in-air was 557.1 mGy for ABH, 13.7 mGy for ETD, and 179.6 mGy for Synchrony. Relative to ETD, ABH delivered approximately 41 times higher accumulated kerma-in-air, and Synchrony approximately 13 times higher values. CONCLUSION: Under harmonized conditions and equivalent fiducial localization performance, ETD resulted in the lowest accumulated intrafraction kerma-in-air, Synchrony with intermediate values, and ABH with the highest contribution. These differences reflect intrinsic imaging geometry and acquisition design. Although kerma-in-air does not directly represent absorbed patient or organ dose, the results emphasize that imaging exposure should be considered when selecting intrafraction monitoring strategies for prostate SBRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica Medica
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2026.105860
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of kV imaging air kerma for intrafraction prostate fiducial monitoring using three clinical systems

Paul Retif, Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou, Romain Letellier, Emilie Verrecchia‐Ramos et al.
Physica Medica
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparative assessment of kV imaging air kerma for intrafraction prostate fiducial monitoring using three clinical systems

Paul Retif, Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou, Romain Letellier, Emilie Verrecchia‐Ramos, Estelle Pfletschinger, Fabian Taesch, Xavier Michel, Motchy Saleh, Anwar Al Salah
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accumulated kerma-in-air associated with intrafraction fiducial-based prostate localization in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) across three clinical platforms: Varian TrueBeam with AutoBeam Hold (ABH), Varian TrueBeam with Brainlab ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD), and Accuray Radixact with Synchrony. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom containing four gold fiducial markers was used. For each system, the lowest kilovoltage exposure parameters allowing stable automatic fiducial localization were identified. The corresponding kerma-in-air per image was then measured at isocenter using a calibrated dosimetry system. Per-image values were extrapolated to per-fraction and full-course accumulated kerma-in-air estimates based on clinically representative intrafraction monitoring frequencies for prostate SBRT. RESULTS: The mean kerma-in-air per image was 1.47 mGy for TrueBeam ABH, 0.034 mGy for ETD, and 0.15 mGy for Radixact Synchrony. When extrapolated to a five-fraction SBRT regimen, cumulative kerma-in-air was 557.1 mGy for ABH, 13.7 mGy for ETD, and 179.6 mGy for Synchrony. Relative to ETD, ABH delivered approximately 41 times higher accumulated kerma-in-air, and Synchrony approximately 13 times higher values. CONCLUSION: Under harmonized conditions and equivalent fiducial localization performance, ETD resulted in the lowest accumulated intrafraction kerma-in-air, Synchrony with intermediate values, and ABH with the highest contribution. These differences reflect intrinsic imaging geometry and acquisition design. Although kerma-in-air does not directly represent absorbed patient or organ dose, the results emphasize that imaging exposure should be considered when selecting intrafraction monitoring strategies for prostate SBRT.

Physica MedicaVol. 148
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional de Metz-Thionville (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.