Blood cancers in indigenous populations: A global systematic review of incidence, mortality, and survival (1954–2024)

The current evidence of global disparities in blood cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Indigenous peoples are limited and fragmented. This systematic review aims to synthesize the epidemiological outcomes of blood cancer in Indigenous peoples to provide a comprehensive global perspective. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review included original papers reporting the incidence, mortality, or survival of leukaemias, lymphomas, and myelomas among Indigenous populations. CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 2025. Descriptive analyses on the study outcomes was conducted and the quality of the included papers were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). We included 126 articles spanning 16 countries, with 47% of reports published in the last 15 years and 90% originating from the US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia, highlighting the scarcity of data from Indigenous peoples outside high-income nations. While substantial heterogeneity limited direct comparisons of outcomes, analysis revealed that Indigenous peoples with blood cancer consistently experience poorer survival. Quality appraisal using the MMAT rated 83% of studies as high or good quality. This systematic review heavily concentrated on high-income countries, with very little evidence available from other regions. Most studies were rated high or good quality, reinforcing the reliability of these findings on poorer survival outcomes for Indigenous peoples compared to non-Indigenous groups diagnosed with a blood cancer. This underscores the urgent need for improved global data collection, greater Indigenous leadership in research, and targeted interventions to address these persistent survival disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2026.103141
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood cancers in indigenous populations: A global systematic review of incidence, mortality, and survival (1954–2024)

Jodie Jetann, Shafkat Jahan, Nienke Zomerdijk, Gail Garvey et al.
Cancer Epidemiology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Blood cancers in indigenous populations: A global systematic review of incidence, mortality, and survival (1954–2024)

Jodie Jetann, Shafkat Jahan, Nienke Zomerdijk, Gail Garvey, Vanda Nissen, Ken Carter, Ming Li
article en

Abstract

The current evidence of global disparities in blood cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Indigenous peoples are limited and fragmented. This systematic review aims to synthesize the epidemiological outcomes of blood cancer in Indigenous peoples to provide a comprehensive global perspective. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review included original papers reporting the incidence, mortality, or survival of leukaemias, lymphomas, and myelomas among Indigenous populations. CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 2025. Descriptive analyses on the study outcomes was conducted and the quality of the included papers were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). We included 126 articles spanning 16 countries, with 47% of reports published in the last 15 years and 90% originating from the US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia, highlighting the scarcity of data from Indigenous peoples outside high-income nations. While substantial heterogeneity limited direct comparisons of outcomes, analysis revealed that Indigenous peoples with blood cancer consistently experience poorer survival. Quality appraisal using the MMAT rated 83% of studies as high or good quality. This systematic review heavily concentrated on high-income countries, with very little evidence available from other regions. Most studies were rated high or good quality, reinforcing the reliability of these findings on poorer survival outcomes for Indigenous peoples compared to non-Indigenous groups diagnosed with a blood cancer. This underscores the urgent need for improved global data collection, greater Indigenous leadership in research, and targeted interventions to address these persistent survival disparities.

Cancer EpidemiologyVol. 103
Queensland Health (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.