Maximum Expected Time of Rescue by Canadian Coast Guard vessels to maritime incidents in the Canadian Arctic

Global warming has increased mean annual temperatures in Canada and the Arctic by 1.7°C and 2.3°C respectively from 1948 to 2016. This has already led into increased maritime activity, with future projections further heightening concerns about Arctic shipping incidents. The International Maritime Organization’s Polar Code, the main regulatory vehicle for shipping safety in polar waters, mandates ships to estimate the Maximum Expected Time of Rescue (METR), i.e. the time during which a vessel should be self-sustaining until external rescue arrives to bring the ship complement to a place of safety. The Code stipulates that this METR should at least be 5 days, but there currently is a lack of approaches to estimate METR. This study investigates whether the 5-day response timeframe is adequate in the Canadian Arctic. Focusing on response by official assets, notably the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) vessels, this research presents a simulation model to estimate response durations considering ice coverage, seasonal variation, bathymetry, and vessel ice-going capabilities. The simulations rely on Automatic Identification System and historical sea ice data analysis to identify spatio-temporal patterns of response time of available CCG vessels to incidents in the Canadian Arctic. The research presents results for different Canadian Arctic zones for biweekly periods, revealing that the Polar Code’s 5-day METR requirement is often inadequate at multiple times of the year, particularly in western zones of the Canadian Arctic with dense ice coverage. A discussion focuses on practical and policy implications of the findings, and various future research avenues are outlined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107333
Primary Topic
Maritime Navigation and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximum Expected Time of Rescue by Canadian Coast Guard vessels to maritime incidents in the Canadian Arctic

Floris Goerlandt, Kimia Mostaghimi, Ronald Pelot
Safety Science
Maritime Navigation and Safety
article

Maximum Expected Time of Rescue by Canadian Coast Guard vessels to maritime incidents in the Canadian Arctic

Floris Goerlandt, Kimia Mostaghimi, Ronald Pelot
article en

Abstract

Global warming has increased mean annual temperatures in Canada and the Arctic by 1.7°C and 2.3°C respectively from 1948 to 2016. This has already led into increased maritime activity, with future projections further heightening concerns about Arctic shipping incidents. The International Maritime Organization’s Polar Code, the main regulatory vehicle for shipping safety in polar waters, mandates ships to estimate the Maximum Expected Time of Rescue (METR), i.e. the time during which a vessel should be self-sustaining until external rescue arrives to bring the ship complement to a place of safety. The Code stipulates that this METR should at least be 5 days, but there currently is a lack of approaches to estimate METR. This study investigates whether the 5-day response timeframe is adequate in the Canadian Arctic. Focusing on response by official assets, notably the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) vessels, this research presents a simulation model to estimate response durations considering ice coverage, seasonal variation, bathymetry, and vessel ice-going capabilities. The simulations rely on Automatic Identification System and historical sea ice data analysis to identify spatio-temporal patterns of response time of available CCG vessels to incidents in the Canadian Arctic. The research presents results for different Canadian Arctic zones for biweekly periods, revealing that the Polar Code’s 5-day METR requirement is often inadequate at multiple times of the year, particularly in western zones of the Canadian Arctic with dense ice coverage. A discussion focuses on practical and policy implications of the findings, and various future research avenues are outlined.

Safety ScienceVol. 203
Dalhousie University (CA)
Public Safety Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, National Research Council Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Maritime Navigation and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.