Null Controls and Replication Limits of Leakage-Sensitive Interrupted-Tag Readout in a Closed-Excursion fSim-GNS Pilot

his technical addendum reports a v0.10 null-control and replication sequence for leakage-sensitive interrupted-tag readout in a closed-excursion fSim-GNS pilot on a superconducting q11–q12 pair. The study was designed to test whether a previously observed interrupted-tag response could be separated from tag-only disturbance, weak off-branch flux sensitivity, and ordinary computational-subspace response. The sequence proceeded through five stages. First, a nominal weak off-branch amplitude control was found not to be a clean null. Second, a clean-null selector using zero-amplitude and weak-amplitude placeholder branches identified quieter control conditions and a near-threshold partner-channel response near 104 ns. Third, a 104 ns state-control add-on produced one prep11-selective partner-channel hit satisfying the pre-specified state-selective criterion. Fourth, an immediate replication failed to reproduce this hit. Fifth, a local timing re-scan over 96–112 ns did not recover a partner-channel or p11 peak. The integrated result supports a conservative interpretation: the interrupted-tag protocol can produce structured leakage/tag-sensitive responses under some conditions, but the strongest state-selective hit was intermittent or drift-sensitive rather than a robust fixed-time qutrit-level signature. The present work does not perform qutrit-resolved readout and does not directly observe |02⟩ or |20⟩. It therefore reports an operational measurement-design boundary: weak control-side tagging with standard binary readout is insufficient for stable direct identification of transient qutrit-level participation on this cloud-accessible device. The recommended next direction is to move from weakly perturbing hidden leakage components to actively mapping leakage participation into measurement-accessible computational-basis differences, for example through partner-targeted tagging, calibrated |2⟩→|1⟩ mapping, or qutrit-resolved readout. Keywords:superconducting qubits; transmon qutrits; leakage tagging; interrupted readout; fSim; fast flux; closed excursion; SU(3); qutrit leakage; null controls; replication; state-control; quantum control; TIST-QC; GNS

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20687597
Primary Topic
Quantum and electron transport phenomena
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Null Controls and Replication Limits of Leakage-Sensitive Interrupted-Tag Readout in a Closed-Excursion fSim-GNS Pilot

Kosaku Tabuchi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum and electron transport phenomena
preprint

Null Controls and Replication Limits of Leakage-Sensitive Interrupted-Tag Readout in a Closed-Excursion fSim-GNS Pilot

Kosaku Tabuchi
preprint en

Abstract

his technical addendum reports a v0.10 null-control and replication sequence for leakage-sensitive interrupted-tag readout in a closed-excursion fSim-GNS pilot on a superconducting q11–q12 pair. The study was designed to test whether a previously observed interrupted-tag response could be separated from tag-only disturbance, weak off-branch flux sensitivity, and ordinary computational-subspace response. The sequence proceeded through five stages. First, a nominal weak off-branch amplitude control was found not to be a clean null. Second, a clean-null selector using zero-amplitude and weak-amplitude placeholder branches identified quieter control conditions and a near-threshold partner-channel response near 104 ns. Third, a 104 ns state-control add-on produced one prep11-selective partner-channel hit satisfying the pre-specified state-selective criterion. Fourth, an immediate replication failed to reproduce this hit. Fifth, a local timing re-scan over 96–112 ns did not recover a partner-channel or p11 peak. The integrated result supports a conservative interpretation: the interrupted-tag protocol can produce structured leakage/tag-sensitive responses under some conditions, but the strongest state-selective hit was intermittent or drift-sensitive rather than a robust fixed-time qutrit-level signature. The present work does not perform qutrit-resolved readout and does not directly observe |02⟩ or |20⟩. It therefore reports an operational measurement-design boundary: weak control-side tagging with standard binary readout is insufficient for stable direct identification of transient qutrit-level participation on this cloud-accessible device. The recommended next direction is to move from weakly perturbing hidden leakage components to actively mapping leakage participation into measurement-accessible computational-basis differences, for example through partner-targeted tagging, calibrated |2⟩→|1⟩ mapping, or qutrit-resolved readout. Keywords:superconducting qubits; transmon qutrits; leakage tagging; interrupted readout; fSim; fast flux; closed excursion; SU(3); qutrit leakage; null controls; replication; state-control; quantum control; TIST-QC; GNS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum and electron transport phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.