Why Spontaneous Market Order Inevitably Leads toCapital Concentration and Fails to Resolve Itself, Alongwith the Formation of Inflation — Illustrated Through aSimple Narrative

This paper uses a simple story about a tea market town to demonstrate how the spontaneous order of a market economy inevitably leads to capital concentration and cannot resolve it by itself. The story shows that an initial capital advantage (Person A) accumulates wealth by creating demand, grading products, and exploiting wealth gaps to generate symbolic value. As a result, the purchasing power of ordinary people declines, creating a demand shortfall. When authorities try to fill this gap by increasing the money supply, the new money flows first to the rich, pushing up prices of high-end goods while reducing the supply of basic necessities. This triggers currency depreciation, cost-push inflation, and ultimately stagflation. The conclusion is that without external interventions (such as antitrust laws or progressive taxation), the market will not spontaneously disperse capital; instead, it continuously creates new spaces for concentration. Inflation is an endogenous outcome of unequal distribution, and unlimited money printing cannot save the economy—it only worsens the crisis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20687173
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Why Spontaneous Market Order Inevitably Leads toCapital Concentration and Fails to Resolve Itself, Alongwith the Formation of Inflation — Illustrated Through aSimple Narrative

Pige Li
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic theories and models
preprint

Why Spontaneous Market Order Inevitably Leads toCapital Concentration and Fails to Resolve Itself, Alongwith the Formation of Inflation — Illustrated Through aSimple Narrative

Pige Li
preprint en

Abstract

This paper uses a simple story about a tea market town to demonstrate how the spontaneous order of a market economy inevitably leads to capital concentration and cannot resolve it by itself. The story shows that an initial capital advantage (Person A) accumulates wealth by creating demand, grading products, and exploiting wealth gaps to generate symbolic value. As a result, the purchasing power of ordinary people declines, creating a demand shortfall. When authorities try to fill this gap by increasing the money supply, the new money flows first to the rich, pushing up prices of high-end goods while reducing the supply of basic necessities. This triggers currency depreciation, cost-push inflation, and ultimately stagflation. The conclusion is that without external interventions (such as antitrust laws or progressive taxation), the market will not spontaneously disperse capital; instead, it continuously creates new spaces for concentration. Inflation is an endogenous outcome of unequal distribution, and unlimited money printing cannot save the economy—it only worsens the crisis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why Spontaneous Market Order Inevitably Leads toCapital Concentration and Fails to Resolve Itself, Alongwith the Formation of Inflation — Illustrated Through aSimple Narrative — Pige Li · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS