Causal Inference for Compliance-Gated Administrative Data: A Tested Data-Generating Process Approach with Application to Municipal Energy Benchmarking

Every causal conclusion drawn from observational data is conditional on a causal graph, and in most applied work the graph is asserted rather than tested. This paper identifies a class of administrative datasets for which the testing problem is tractable: compliance-gated datasets, in which units report outcomes if and only if observable characteristics cross a regulatory threshold, so that the institutional documents defining the reporting obligation also encode the process that generated the data. We develop a three-stage pipeline, the Tested Data-Generating Process (TDGP), that locates the compliance gate in the dataset’s missingness structure, formulates a candidate causal graph from that structure and the variable descriptions alone, and then tests the candidate against the constitutive documents, which are quarantined until the test. We demonstrate the pipeline on the Chicago Energy Benchmarking dataset, 28,329 building-year records (2014–2023) gated at 50,000 square feet, where the candidate survives the documentary test and the recorded data reproduce the EPA greenhouse-gas accounting identity to R2 = 0.9999. We are explicit about what this buys: the reconstruction confirms that the data implement a documented accounting identity rather than discovering an empirical law, and one structural condition the documents cannot reach, the ignorability of residual selection, is carried as an assumption rather than tested. A 2×3 factorial experiment crossing causal correction with functional form then shows what the tested structure licenses: an inverse-probability-weighted hierarchical Bayesian model and IPW XGBoost converge to within 0.4 percentage points of median absolute percentage error (21.4% against 21.0%), evidence that structural and algorithmic models estimate the same causal quantity once the data-generating process is tested. On this single, mildly selected application the convergence is consistent with Breiman’s two-cultures tension dissolving under that condition; we offer it as a worked demonstration of the condition rather than a general resolution. The tested structure further supports deployment prediction for the 5,510 non-compliant records excluded from all training and counterfactual policy queries that the gated sample alone cannot answer.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20686697
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Causal Inference for Compliance-Gated Administrative Data: A Tested Data-Generating Process Approach with Application to Municipal Energy Benchmarking

Xuân Chính Mai
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
preprint

Causal Inference for Compliance-Gated Administrative Data: A Tested Data-Generating Process Approach with Application to Municipal Energy Benchmarking

Xuân Chính Mai
preprint en

Abstract

Every causal conclusion drawn from observational data is conditional on a causal graph, and in most applied work the graph is asserted rather than tested. This paper identifies a class of administrative datasets for which the testing problem is tractable: compliance-gated datasets, in which units report outcomes if and only if observable characteristics cross a regulatory threshold, so that the institutional documents defining the reporting obligation also encode the process that generated the data. We develop a three-stage pipeline, the Tested Data-Generating Process (TDGP), that locates the compliance gate in the dataset’s missingness structure, formulates a candidate causal graph from that structure and the variable descriptions alone, and then tests the candidate against the constitutive documents, which are quarantined until the test. We demonstrate the pipeline on the Chicago Energy Benchmarking dataset, 28,329 building-year records (2014–2023) gated at 50,000 square feet, where the candidate survives the documentary test and the recorded data reproduce the EPA greenhouse-gas accounting identity to R2 = 0.9999. We are explicit about what this buys: the reconstruction confirms that the data implement a documented accounting identity rather than discovering an empirical law, and one structural condition the documents cannot reach, the ignorability of residual selection, is carried as an assumption rather than tested. A 2×3 factorial experiment crossing causal correction with functional form then shows what the tested structure licenses: an inverse-probability-weighted hierarchical Bayesian model and IPW XGBoost converge to within 0.4 percentage points of median absolute percentage error (21.4% against 21.0%), evidence that structural and algorithmic models estimate the same causal quantity once the data-generating process is tested. On this single, mildly selected application the convergence is consistent with Breiman’s two-cultures tension dissolving under that condition; we offer it as a worked demonstration of the condition rather than a general resolution. The tested structure further supports deployment prediction for the 5,510 non-compliant records excluded from all training and counterfactual policy queries that the gated sample alone cannot answer.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.