Barriers to dengue vaccine uptake in international travelers: a mixed-methods study

Background Dengue poses a growing threat to international travelers, yet vaccine uptake remains limited due to inconsistent guidelines and psychological barriers. This study provides barriers and determinants of hesitancy, which may guide strategies once global dengue vaccination guidelines for travelers are established.Research design and methods We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study from May 2024 to March 2025 in Bangkok, Thailand, assessing vaccine hesitancy among 429 international travelers using the 5C model and thematic analysis of interviews.Results The prevalence of dengue vaccine hesitancy was higher than previous literature. Dengue vaccine acceptance was 36.8%, with non-religious affiliation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.89; 95% CI: 2.55–9.38), higher confidence, and lower perceived constraints significantly associated with acceptance. Non-acceptors reported significantly higher levels of complacency and constraints, and lower collective responsibility scores (all p < 0.001). Travelers often underestimated dengue risk and cited logistical challenges and vaccine accessibility as barriers. Trust in healthcare providers, especially from endemic regions, influenced decisions, while collective responsibility was less relevant.Conclusions High dengue vaccine hesitancy highlights the need for healthcare providers to enhance vaccine confidence through evidence-based counseling and address complacency by correcting risk misconception. Improving vaccine accessibility and aligning schedules with travel plans may reduce constraints and vaccine messaging may be more effective by prioritizing individual-level benefit to maximize impact once global guidelines are established.Clinical trial registration The study was registered with the Clinical Trials.gov (Clinical trial.gov NCT06418854).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Review of Vaccines
Published
2026-06-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2026.2689612
Primary Topic
Travel-related health issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to dengue vaccine uptake in international travelers: a mixed-methods study

Rachata Charoenwisedsil, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan, Daniel M. Parker, Narisa Ruenroengbun et al.
Expert Review of Vaccines
Travel-related health issues
article

Barriers to dengue vaccine uptake in international travelers: a mixed-methods study

Rachata Charoenwisedsil, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan, Daniel M. Parker, Narisa Ruenroengbun, Thundon Ngamprasertchai, Gerard T. Flaherty, Saranath Lawpoolsri
article en

Abstract

Background Dengue poses a growing threat to international travelers, yet vaccine uptake remains limited due to inconsistent guidelines and psychological barriers. This study provides barriers and determinants of hesitancy, which may guide strategies once global dengue vaccination guidelines for travelers are established.Research design and methods We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study from May 2024 to March 2025 in Bangkok, Thailand, assessing vaccine hesitancy among 429 international travelers using the 5C model and thematic analysis of interviews.Results The prevalence of dengue vaccine hesitancy was higher than previous literature. Dengue vaccine acceptance was 36.8%, with non-religious affiliation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.89; 95% CI: 2.55–9.38), higher confidence, and lower perceived constraints significantly associated with acceptance. Non-acceptors reported significantly higher levels of complacency and constraints, and lower collective responsibility scores (all p < 0.001). Travelers often underestimated dengue risk and cited logistical challenges and vaccine accessibility as barriers. Trust in healthcare providers, especially from endemic regions, influenced decisions, while collective responsibility was less relevant.Conclusions High dengue vaccine hesitancy highlights the need for healthcare providers to enhance vaccine confidence through evidence-based counseling and address complacency by correcting risk misconception. Improving vaccine accessibility and aligning schedules with travel plans may reduce constraints and vaccine messaging may be more effective by prioritizing individual-level benefit to maximize impact once global guidelines are established.Clinical trial registration The study was registered with the Clinical Trials.gov (Clinical trial.gov NCT06418854).

Expert Review of Vaccines
Burapha University (TH), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Mahidol University (TH), University of California System (US), Silpakorn University (TH)
Mahidol University, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Travel-related health issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.