Rett syndrome and real-world treatment patterns of trofinetide in the United States

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide (TROF) remains the first and only FDA-approved pharmacologic treatment for Rett syndrome (RTT). There is limited real-world evidence on TROF use, restarts, dosing patterns and predictors of non-persistence. This study evaluated long-term treatment patterns and baseline predictors of non-persistence among RTT individuals initiating TROF. METHODS: TROF prescription (RX) between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024 with ≥6 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment were classified as persistent (gap ≤90 days) and non-persistent. Median (IQR) time on treatment was analyzed, and Kaplan-Meier assessed time to non-persistence. Restarts among non-persistent were examined. Dosing patterns such as mean dose in milligrams (mg) and percentage target daily dose (%TDD) at each RX were evaluated. Predictors of non-persistence were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 1,175 TROF initiators, 54.9% were persistent and 45.1% were non-persistent; 7.6% of non-persistent individuals restarted. Mean ± SD age was 14.7 ± 10.8 vs. 16.5 ± 11.6 years and median ± IQR time on TROF was 14.3 ± 4.6 vs. 3.0 ± 3.8 months, respectively. Over 75% remained on treatment beyond 3 months, and more than half continued through study follow-up. Mean twice daily (BID) TROF dose was lower among persistent (7422.0 mg) vs. non-persistent (7850.8 mg) at RX1 and increased to 7953.7 mg vs 8423.4 mg, respectively at RX2. Thereafter, the persistent individuals maintained stable dosing, while the non-persistent showed greater fluctuation over time. Similar patterns were observed for %TDD. Older age and history of infectious disorders were significantly associated with non-persistence. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis, more than half of RTT individuals remained persistent on TROF for ≥14 months. Stable dosing patterns were observed among persistent individuals, while greater dose variability was observed among non-persistent individuals. Thus, these findings may provide guidance to clinicians about long-term TROF use in real-world practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Economics
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2026.2682668
Primary Topic
Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rett syndrome and real-world treatment patterns of trofinetide in the United States

Krithika Rajagopalan, Nazia Rashid, Vinod Yakkala, Safiuddin S. Syed
Journal of Medical Economics
Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
article

Rett syndrome and real-world treatment patterns of trofinetide in the United States

Krithika Rajagopalan, Nazia Rashid, Vinod Yakkala, Safiuddin S. Syed
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trofinetide (TROF) remains the first and only FDA-approved pharmacologic treatment for Rett syndrome (RTT). There is limited real-world evidence on TROF use, restarts, dosing patterns and predictors of non-persistence. This study evaluated long-term treatment patterns and baseline predictors of non-persistence among RTT individuals initiating TROF. METHODS: TROF prescription (RX) between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024 with ≥6 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment were classified as persistent (gap ≤90 days) and non-persistent. Median (IQR) time on treatment was analyzed, and Kaplan-Meier assessed time to non-persistence. Restarts among non-persistent were examined. Dosing patterns such as mean dose in milligrams (mg) and percentage target daily dose (%TDD) at each RX were evaluated. Predictors of non-persistence were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 1,175 TROF initiators, 54.9% were persistent and 45.1% were non-persistent; 7.6% of non-persistent individuals restarted. Mean ± SD age was 14.7 ± 10.8 vs. 16.5 ± 11.6 years and median ± IQR time on TROF was 14.3 ± 4.6 vs. 3.0 ± 3.8 months, respectively. Over 75% remained on treatment beyond 3 months, and more than half continued through study follow-up. Mean twice daily (BID) TROF dose was lower among persistent (7422.0 mg) vs. non-persistent (7850.8 mg) at RX1 and increased to 7953.7 mg vs 8423.4 mg, respectively at RX2. Thereafter, the persistent individuals maintained stable dosing, while the non-persistent showed greater fluctuation over time. Similar patterns were observed for %TDD. Older age and history of infectious disorders were significantly associated with non-persistence. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis, more than half of RTT individuals remained persistent on TROF for ≥14 months. Stable dosing patterns were observed among persistent individuals, while greater dose variability was observed among non-persistent individuals. Thus, these findings may provide guidance to clinicians about long-term TROF use in real-world practice.

Journal of Medical EconomicsVol. 29(1)
Acadia Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.