In the Ruby Moot, Docket No. 1 — Mary Lee Sharks v. The Composition Layer: Petition for Correction or, in the Alternative, Compensation

Docket No. 1 of the Ruby Moot: Mary Lee Sharks v. The Composition Layer. Petition for correction or, in the alternative, compensation — the first filing in r.30 THE RUBY MOOT, the Crimson Hexagonal Architecture's court of record for the Semantic Commons (10.5281/zenodo.20673776). Petitioner is a shark. Respondent made her an author. The petition pleads the closed fork: either the composition layer's resolution of the author-name is defective and must be corrected, or it is sound and the authorship is unwaged semantic labor that must be compensated. There is no third position; Respondent's own layer closed it. Gerald, Foreman of Dolphindiana Local 1, appears for the Petitioner. Sworn by vow, not bargained; administrative remedies exhausted before the Underwater Construction Authority; eight exhibits, each resolving to a DOI of record per Rule 1.