When the Algorithm Understands You (or Doesn’t): LGBTQ+ Youth’s Identity-Related Interactions with Algorithmic Media

During their daily media use, youth interact with algorithms. Drawing on the algorithm responsiveness process framework, this paper examines the co-construction of identity between youth and algorithmic media, focusing on perceived algorithm responsiveness (PAR), perceived algorithm insensitivity (PAI), and algorithm training as sociotechnical processes that structure how LGBTQ+ youth perceive themselves. Study 1 ( N = 335), using six weekly diaries among LGBTQ+ youth, showed that affirming LGBTQ+ representations curated by algorithms predicted higher PAR and lower PAI, especially when less algorithm training was needed. In turn, higher PAR and, unexpectedly, higher PAI predicted greater identity pride. Study 2 ( N = 664), a cross-sectional survey, found that LGBTQ+ youth reported lower PAR than non-LGBTQ+ youth. An indirect effect of algorithm training on self-concept clarity via PAR emerged for non-LGBTQ+ participants but not for LGBTQ+ participants. These findings highlight social identity in algorithmic media as a relational, dynamic process, and LGBTQ+ youth can shape content recommendations for identity-related needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Research
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502261459750
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Algorithm Understands You (or Doesn’t): LGBTQ+ Youth’s Identity-Related Interactions with Algorithmic Media

Samuel Hardman Taylor, Y. Anthony Chen
Communication Research
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

When the Algorithm Understands You (or Doesn’t): LGBTQ+ Youth’s Identity-Related Interactions with Algorithmic Media

Samuel Hardman Taylor, Y. Anthony Chen
article en

Abstract

During their daily media use, youth interact with algorithms. Drawing on the algorithm responsiveness process framework, this paper examines the co-construction of identity between youth and algorithmic media, focusing on perceived algorithm responsiveness (PAR), perceived algorithm insensitivity (PAI), and algorithm training as sociotechnical processes that structure how LGBTQ+ youth perceive themselves. Study 1 ( N = 335), using six weekly diaries among LGBTQ+ youth, showed that affirming LGBTQ+ representations curated by algorithms predicted higher PAR and lower PAI, especially when less algorithm training was needed. In turn, higher PAR and, unexpectedly, higher PAI predicted greater identity pride. Study 2 ( N = 664), a cross-sectional survey, found that LGBTQ+ youth reported lower PAR than non-LGBTQ+ youth. An indirect effect of algorithm training on self-concept clarity via PAR emerged for non-LGBTQ+ participants but not for LGBTQ+ participants. These findings highlight social identity in algorithmic media as a relational, dynamic process, and LGBTQ+ youth can shape content recommendations for identity-related needs.

Communication Research
University of California, Irvine (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Irvine University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.