Data repoliticization and environmental governance: how civic data activism negotiates state bureaucracy in Taiwan

Illegal factories on farmland represent one of Taiwan’s most persistent environmental governance challenges. This article examines how civic actors Thaubing Footprints confronted this issue through data activism. In 2020, the group used Taiwan’s Presidential Hackathon as an entry point to demand data transparency and to challenge regulatory loopholes on farmland factories. During and after the hackathon, activists integrated datasets from multiple ministries and extended their advocacy into the public sphere to sustain policy pressure. The article conceptualizes this process as data repoliticization. Data repoliticization consists of three mutually reinforcing processes: data reassembly, interpretive contestation, and data arena shifting. Through these processes, civic actors expose inconsistencies across data infrastructures and mobilize them to challenge established practices of environmental governance. This article adopts a document-based qualitative analysis informed by practical experience. Building on this approach, the article analyzes the processes and mechanisms through which civic data activism influences environmental policy. In doing so, it contributes to scholarship on data activism and environmental justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sociology
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2026.2685272
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data repoliticization and environmental governance: how civic data activism negotiates state bureaucracy in Taiwan

John Chung‐En Liu, Chen-Yuan Chen
Environmental Sociology
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Data repoliticization and environmental governance: how civic data activism negotiates state bureaucracy in Taiwan

John Chung‐En Liu, Chen-Yuan Chen
article en

Abstract

Illegal factories on farmland represent one of Taiwan’s most persistent environmental governance challenges. This article examines how civic actors Thaubing Footprints confronted this issue through data activism. In 2020, the group used Taiwan’s Presidential Hackathon as an entry point to demand data transparency and to challenge regulatory loopholes on farmland factories. During and after the hackathon, activists integrated datasets from multiple ministries and extended their advocacy into the public sphere to sustain policy pressure. The article conceptualizes this process as data repoliticization. Data repoliticization consists of three mutually reinforcing processes: data reassembly, interpretive contestation, and data arena shifting. Through these processes, civic actors expose inconsistencies across data infrastructures and mobilize them to challenge established practices of environmental governance. This article adopts a document-based qualitative analysis informed by practical experience. Building on this approach, the article analyzes the processes and mechanisms through which civic data activism influences environmental policy. In doing so, it contributes to scholarship on data activism and environmental justice.

Environmental Sociology
National Taiwan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data repoliticization and environmental governance: how civic data activism negotiates state bureaucracy in Taiwan — John Chung‐En Liu, Chen-Yuan Chen · Environmental Sociology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS