Can ovarian cancer screening work? A secondary analysis of the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening

Abstract Background The UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS; 2001–2020) showed no reduction in disease mortality in its primary intervention arm using multimodal screening (MMS) with longitudinal Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) and transvaginal ultrasound. Whether this null result reflects the stop-screen design, screening performance, or ovarian cancer natural history remains unclear. Methods Using individual-level screening and diagnosis data from the MMS arm, we estimated ovarian cancer natural history, focusing on high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), the most common and lethal subtype. We then simulated trial outcomes under (1) continued screening beyond the trial screening interval and (2) high sensitivity for early-stage detection over an extended time period. Results The estimated window for detecting early-stage HGSC under MMS was <6 months. Continued screening yielded at most a 15% relative mortality reduction. Achieving a ≥20% mortality reduction required extending the detectable early-stage window to 1 year and attaining ≥70% sensitivity during this period. Conclusion Current screening modalities offer a very limited opportunity to intercept HGSC at an early stage. Clinically effective ovarian cancer screening will require first- and second-line tests capable of detecting HGSC substantially earlier in its natural history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03490-2
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ovarian cancer screening work? A secondary analysis of the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening

Jane M Lange, Marc D. Ryser, Andy Ryan, S. Holloway et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Can ovarian cancer screening work? A secondary analysis of the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening

Jane M Lange, Marc D. Ryser, Andy Ryan, S. Holloway, Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj, Usha Menon, Sophia Apostolidou, Isabel Dengos, Ishfaq Ahmad, Ruth Etzioni
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS; 2001–2020) showed no reduction in disease mortality in its primary intervention arm using multimodal screening (MMS) with longitudinal Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) and transvaginal ultrasound. Whether this null result reflects the stop-screen design, screening performance, or ovarian cancer natural history remains unclear. Methods Using individual-level screening and diagnosis data from the MMS arm, we estimated ovarian cancer natural history, focusing on high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), the most common and lethal subtype. We then simulated trial outcomes under (1) continued screening beyond the trial screening interval and (2) high sensitivity for early-stage detection over an extended time period. Results The estimated window for detecting early-stage HGSC under MMS was <6 months. Continued screening yielded at most a 15% relative mortality reduction. Achieving a ≥20% mortality reduction required extending the detectable early-stage window to 1 year and attaining ≥70% sensitivity during this period. Conclusion Current screening modalities offer a very limited opportunity to intercept HGSC at an early stage. Clinically effective ovarian cancer screening will require first- and second-line tests capable of detecting HGSC substantially earlier in its natural history.

British Journal of Cancer
University of Geneva (CH), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Duke University (US), University of Washington (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), Institute for Reproductive Health (US), University College London (GB), Seattle University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.