Efficacy of remimazolam besylate versus propofol on hemodynamics during anesthetic induction in elderly patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

The effect of remimazolam besylate versus propofol on hemodynamics during bronchoscopy remains uncertain. To test the hypothesis that remimazolam besylate can provide a more stable hemodynamic profile than propofol in the elderly for bronchoscopy under general anesthesia and calculate the optimal induction doses. A total of 232 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent bronchoscopy were enrolled. Participants were randomly divided into the remimazolam besylate group or propofol group for sedation. The patients received titrated induction with remimazolam besylate or propofol combined with remifentanil and maintenance with assigned agents. Vital signs and bispectral index (BIS) changes were monitored. The cognitive test was performed before and after operation. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension during induction. Secondary key outcomes included average real variability of mean arterial pressure, titrated dose of remimazolam besylate and propofol during induction, and the BIS changes. Other outcomes included baseline characteristics, intraoperative anesthesia-related data, and other adverse events. The remimazolam besylate group had a significantly lower incidence of hypotension during anesthetic induction (28.44% vs. 73.33%,95% CI 1.88–3.56, P < 0.001). The average real variability of mean arterial pressure of remimazolam besylate group was 8.25 ((Interquartile range [IQR] 6.33–11.50) mmHg/min smaller than that 12.33 (IQR 9.00–14.67) mmHg/min in propofol group ( P < 0.001). The optimal dose of remimazolam besylate by titration during induction was 0.16 (IQR 0.15–0.18) mg/kg. The mean BIS values in remimazolam besylate group was higher than that in propofol group [59.35 (IQR 53.15–65.11) vs. 55.13 (IQR 51.72–61.75), P < 0.001]. Remimazolam besylate was superior to propofol in terms of hemodynamics for the elderly undergoing bronchoscopy. Furthermore, we proposed a titrated dose of remimazolam besylate 0.16 mg/kg during induction in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03966-x
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of remimazolam besylate versus propofol on hemodynamics during anesthetic induction in elderly patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Dan Fan, Danni Li, Cheng Yang, Siyi Wei et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Efficacy of remimazolam besylate versus propofol on hemodynamics during anesthetic induction in elderly patients undergoing bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Dan Fan, Danni Li, Cheng Yang, Siyi Wei, YuanYuan Zhou
article en

Abstract

The effect of remimazolam besylate versus propofol on hemodynamics during bronchoscopy remains uncertain. To test the hypothesis that remimazolam besylate can provide a more stable hemodynamic profile than propofol in the elderly for bronchoscopy under general anesthesia and calculate the optimal induction doses. A total of 232 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent bronchoscopy were enrolled. Participants were randomly divided into the remimazolam besylate group or propofol group for sedation. The patients received titrated induction with remimazolam besylate or propofol combined with remifentanil and maintenance with assigned agents. Vital signs and bispectral index (BIS) changes were monitored. The cognitive test was performed before and after operation. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension during induction. Secondary key outcomes included average real variability of mean arterial pressure, titrated dose of remimazolam besylate and propofol during induction, and the BIS changes. Other outcomes included baseline characteristics, intraoperative anesthesia-related data, and other adverse events. The remimazolam besylate group had a significantly lower incidence of hypotension during anesthetic induction (28.44% vs. 73.33%,95% CI 1.88–3.56, P < 0.001). The average real variability of mean arterial pressure of remimazolam besylate group was 8.25 ((Interquartile range [IQR] 6.33–11.50) mmHg/min smaller than that 12.33 (IQR 9.00–14.67) mmHg/min in propofol group ( P < 0.001). The optimal dose of remimazolam besylate by titration during induction was 0.16 (IQR 0.15–0.18) mg/kg. The mean BIS values in remimazolam besylate group was higher than that in propofol group [59.35 (IQR 53.15–65.11) vs. 55.13 (IQR 51.72–61.75), P < 0.001]. Remimazolam besylate was superior to propofol in terms of hemodynamics for the elderly undergoing bronchoscopy. Furthermore, we proposed a titrated dose of remimazolam besylate 0.16 mg/kg during induction in this patient population.

BMC Anesthesiology
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Meizhou City People's Hospital (CN), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.