Midwifery-led care models across health systems: a scoping review protocol of organisational arrangements and core components
<ns3:p>Objective To map and characterize organisational models of midwifery-led care across healthcare systems, identifying their organisational arrangements and core and adaptable components to inform cross-country comparison and contextual adaptation. Introduction Midwifery-led care models are increasingly recognized as effective approaches to improving maternal and newborn outcomes and women’s experiences of care while promoting continuity of care, person-centred maternity services, and sustainable health systems. However, substantial heterogeneity exists in how these models are organised, implemented, and integrated across different health systems. A systematic mapping of organisational arrangements and their contextual conditions is needed to support evidence-informed adaptation and implementation across diverse settings. Inclusion criteria This review will consider sources describing organisational models of midwifery-led care across antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal contexts globally. Midwifery-led care is defined as models in which midwives hold primary clinical and organisational responsibility for coordinating and delivering maternity care, including referral to medical services when required. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature sources will be included. Methods This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by structured grey literature searches of governmental and professional sources. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract data using a structured tool informed by the Intervention Component Analysis framework. Findings will be synthesized through descriptive mapping and comparative analysis of organisational models. Registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DV6QB</ns3:p>
Authors
- Isaac Aranda-Reneo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-2615)
- Anna Martín-Arribas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-595X)
- Manuela Lopes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-3525)
- Andreia Soares Gonçalves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-8215)
- Joni Gilissen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-495X)
- Florence D’haenens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-6501)
- Rafael Vila‐Candel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-2480)
- Conceição Moreira Freitas
- Mara Rocha
- R Moreira
- Narjes Madhloum
- Márcia Conceição
- Elizabeth K. Darling
- Cátia Santos
- Francisco J. Soriano-Vidal
- Ines Rothmann
Institutions
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (PT)
- Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT)
- McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
- Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES)
- Flemish Radio and Television Broadcasting Organisation (BE)
- Karel de Grote Hogeschool (BE)
- Universitat Ramon Llull (ES)
- Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (PT)
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Open Research Europe
- Published
- 2026-06-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.23994.1
- Primary Topic
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00