Could an Angel Undergo Substantial Change? A Quasi-Bonaventurean Speculation (And Why it Matters for Universalist Soteriologies)

By the early 1200s the Roman Catholic Church had ruled that angels are incorporeal. However, debate persisted as to what exactly that meant. Universal hylomorphism (UH) (i.e., the idea that all created beings are composites of form and matter) played a role in that debate, as it implies that even angels are, in a sense, partly material. Among the motivations for UH was the need to preserve angelic mutability, yet some of its advocates (notably St. Bonaventure) thought that the only kind of change angels could undergo is accidental change. What about angelic substantial change? I argue that once UH is on the table, it is difficult to rule it out as impossible. I conclude with the suggestion that affirming the possibility of angelic substantial change provides new support for strict universalists in the domain of soteriology (i.e., those who affirm that even the demons will one day be saved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512261459414
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could an Angel Undergo Substantial Change? A Quasi-Bonaventurean Speculation (And Why it Matters for Universalist Soteriologies)

Travis Dumsday
Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

Could an Angel Undergo Substantial Change? A Quasi-Bonaventurean Speculation (And Why it Matters for Universalist Soteriologies)

Travis Dumsday
article en

Abstract

By the early 1200s the Roman Catholic Church had ruled that angels are incorporeal. However, debate persisted as to what exactly that meant. Universal hylomorphism (UH) (i.e., the idea that all created beings are composites of form and matter) played a role in that debate, as it implies that even angels are, in a sense, partly material. Among the motivations for UH was the need to preserve angelic mutability, yet some of its advocates (notably St. Bonaventure) thought that the only kind of change angels could undergo is accidental change. What about angelic substantial change? I argue that once UH is on the table, it is difficult to rule it out as impossible. I conclude with the suggestion that affirming the possibility of angelic substantial change provides new support for strict universalists in the domain of soteriology (i.e., those who affirm that even the demons will one day be saved).

Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Concordia University of Edmonton (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.