The Need for a Culture of Care and Safety for Ethnobiologists in the Field

Ethnobiology has made significant strides in its ethical engagement with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. However, the discipline has largely overlooked the multidimensional risks and vulnerabilities that researchers themselves encounter. Ethnobiological fieldwork is inherently intersubjective and requires deep emotional engagement, which can impose profound psychological burdens, particularly in contexts marked by structural violence. These risks are not evenly distributed but are shaped by intersectionality; women and researchers from marginalized communities face disproportionate levels of harassment and insecurity. We argue that the current silence around researcher trauma compromises not only individual well-being but also the epistemic integrity of the data collected. To address this, we propose a “culture of care” framework that shifts responsibility from the individual to a collective system of accountability shared by supervisors and institutions. Central to this is a proactive risk management strategy that integrates contextual analyses and establishes clear trigger points for suspending activities. We conclude that fostering a culture of care is an affirmation of epistemic justice, essential for sustaining diverse participation and fostering a more resilient, inclusive, and ethically rigorous science, not only within ethnobiology but across all community-engaged disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethnobiology
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02780771261458780
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Need for a Culture of Care and Safety for Ethnobiologists in the Field

Ina Vandebroek, Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Ana H. Ladio
Journal of Ethnobiology
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

The Need for a Culture of Care and Safety for Ethnobiologists in the Field

Ina Vandebroek, Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Ana H. Ladio
article en

Abstract

Ethnobiology has made significant strides in its ethical engagement with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. However, the discipline has largely overlooked the multidimensional risks and vulnerabilities that researchers themselves encounter. Ethnobiological fieldwork is inherently intersubjective and requires deep emotional engagement, which can impose profound psychological burdens, particularly in contexts marked by structural violence. These risks are not evenly distributed but are shaped by intersectionality; women and researchers from marginalized communities face disproportionate levels of harassment and insecurity. We argue that the current silence around researcher trauma compromises not only individual well-being but also the epistemic integrity of the data collected. To address this, we propose a “culture of care” framework that shifts responsibility from the individual to a collective system of accountability shared by supervisors and institutions. Central to this is a proactive risk management strategy that integrates contextual analyses and establishes clear trigger points for suspending activities. We conclude that fostering a culture of care is an affirmation of epistemic justice, essential for sustaining diverse participation and fostering a more resilient, inclusive, and ethically rigorous science, not only within ethnobiology but across all community-engaged disciplines.

Journal of Ethnobiology
University of the West Indies System (JM), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (AR), Universidade de Pernambuco (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.