The algorithmic trust paradox: A multi-stakeholder analysis of the audit expectation gap in AI-assisted engagements

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into financial auditing disrupts traditional trust-building, significantly impacting the Audit Expectation Gap's dimensions of the Reasonableness Gap (RG) and Deficient Performance (DP). Utilizing Agency and Trust Transfer theories, this study explores these dynamics through Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling and Multi-Group Analysis of 431 professionals in Vietnam, comprising 206 auditees (chief accountants and internal auditors) and 225 beneficiaries (financial analysts and bankers). The participants represent a high-expertise cohort, with over 87% holding post-graduate or professional certifications and more than 45% possessing over 10 years of professional experience. The findings reveal a stark polarization in trust formation: auditees rely primarily on human auditor characteristics like competence and independence, whereas beneficiaries exhibit “algorithm appreciation,” grounding their trust entirely in AI capability and objectivity. Furthermore, institutional trust acts as a double-edged sword. While it effectively mitigates perceptions of DP, it paradoxically inflates the RG by triggering an “expectation halo effect” - a finding that refutes traditional literature which typically views trust as a harmonizing mechanism. where stakeholders falsely equate AI-assisted reasonable assurance with absolute algorithmic certainty. Ultimately, trust serves as a crucial mediator absorbing these socio-technical antecedents. This study contributes to behavioral auditing literature by highlighting the paradoxical capability of trust to exacerbate unreasonable societal expectations in a digital context. The results offer urgent practical implications for audit firms, business practitioners, and standard-setters, emphasizing the need for strategic expectation management and the careful calibration of trust as algorithmic agents become central to the audit process within emerging markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103106
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The algorithmic trust paradox: A multi-stakeholder analysis of the audit expectation gap in AI-assisted engagements

Nguyen Thu Hoai
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

The algorithmic trust paradox: A multi-stakeholder analysis of the audit expectation gap in AI-assisted engagements

Nguyen Thu Hoai
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into financial auditing disrupts traditional trust-building, significantly impacting the Audit Expectation Gap's dimensions of the Reasonableness Gap (RG) and Deficient Performance (DP). Utilizing Agency and Trust Transfer theories, this study explores these dynamics through Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling and Multi-Group Analysis of 431 professionals in Vietnam, comprising 206 auditees (chief accountants and internal auditors) and 225 beneficiaries (financial analysts and bankers). The participants represent a high-expertise cohort, with over 87% holding post-graduate or professional certifications and more than 45% possessing over 10 years of professional experience. The findings reveal a stark polarization in trust formation: auditees rely primarily on human auditor characteristics like competence and independence, whereas beneficiaries exhibit “algorithm appreciation,” grounding their trust entirely in AI capability and objectivity. Furthermore, institutional trust acts as a double-edged sword. While it effectively mitigates perceptions of DP, it paradoxically inflates the RG by triggering an “expectation halo effect” - a finding that refutes traditional literature which typically views trust as a harmonizing mechanism. where stakeholders falsely equate AI-assisted reasonable assurance with absolute algorithmic certainty. Ultimately, trust serves as a crucial mediator absorbing these socio-technical antecedents. This study contributes to behavioral auditing literature by highlighting the paradoxical capability of trust to exacerbate unreasonable societal expectations in a digital context. The results offer urgent practical implications for audit firms, business practitioners, and standard-setters, emphasizing the need for strategic expectation management and the careful calibration of trust as algorithmic agents become central to the audit process within emerging markets.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 14
Thuongmai University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The algorithmic trust paradox: A multi-stakeholder analysis of the audit expectation gap in AI-assisted engagements — Nguyen Thu Hoai · Social Sciences & Humanities Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS