Quantitative Assessment of Metal–Ligand Bonding in Halide‐Containing Terpyridine Pincer Complexes of Group 10 Metals

ABSTRACT This study investigates metal–ligand bonding in planar pincer complexes [(tpy)M(X)] + , where M is Ni(II), Pd(II), or Pt(II) and X is a halide, using DFT and energy decomposition analysis. It shows that electrostatic interactions dominate the overall stability, while interaction strength decreases from fluoride to iodide. Orbital interactions contribute significantly (44.4%–50.2%) to the total attraction and are analyzed in detail under C 2v symmetry through a 1 , a 2 , b 1 , and b 2 components, revealing different metal–ligand overlap patterns. σ‐type interactions are the main orbital contribution (62.7%–76.1%), followed by π interactions (19.4%–29.6%), including in‐plane and out‐of‐plane components. δ‐type interactions are minor (4.8%–7.7%) but arise from metal–ligand π* overlap. Charge transfer trends from ligand to metal correlate well with both electrostatic and total interaction energies, supporting a consistent bonding description across the series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70441
Primary Topic
Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Assessment of Metal–Ligand Bonding in Halide‐Containing Terpyridine Pincer Complexes of Group 10 Metals

Yasin Gholiee
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
article

Quantitative Assessment of Metal–Ligand Bonding in Halide‐Containing Terpyridine Pincer Complexes of Group 10 Metals

Yasin Gholiee
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates metal–ligand bonding in planar pincer complexes [(tpy)M(X)] + , where M is Ni(II), Pd(II), or Pt(II) and X is a halide, using DFT and energy decomposition analysis. It shows that electrostatic interactions dominate the overall stability, while interaction strength decreases from fluoride to iodide. Orbital interactions contribute significantly (44.4%–50.2%) to the total attraction and are analyzed in detail under C 2v symmetry through a 1 , a 2 , b 1 , and b 2 components, revealing different metal–ligand overlap patterns. σ‐type interactions are the main orbital contribution (62.7%–76.1%), followed by π interactions (19.4%–29.6%), including in‐plane and out‐of‐plane components. δ‐type interactions are minor (4.8%–7.7%) but arise from metal–ligand π* overlap. Charge transfer trends from ligand to metal correlate well with both electrostatic and total interaction energies, supporting a consistent bonding description across the series.

Journal of Computational ChemistryVol. 47(16)
Malayer University (IR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantitative Assessment of Metal–Ligand Bonding in Halide‐Containing Terpyridine Pincer Complexes of Group 10 Metals — Yasin Gholiee · Journal of Computational Chemistry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS