Heterogeneous Oral Health Outcomes by Combustible Cigarette Smoking, <scp>E</scp> ‐Cigarette Use and Dual Use: A Cross‐Sectional Population‐Based Analysis

BACKGROUND: Combustible cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for poor oral health, but the implications of e-cigarette use and dual use remain uncertain. Distinguishing the effects of vaping from the lingering consequences of prior smoking is a persistent challenge in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess how distinct nicotine use profiles relate to oral health-related quality of life, self-reported oral health indicators and self-rated dental health among adults in England, while differentiating e-cigarette users by smoking history. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 6027 adults (aged ≥ 16 years) from the nationally representative 2021 Adult Oral Health Survey for England. Participants were classified into five current smoking/vaping categories (never users, former smokers, exclusive cigarette smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, dual users) and, separately, by combined vaping-smoking history. Outcomes included any oral health difficulty and the number of impacts derived from the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), as well as loose teeth, gum disease history, dry mouth and self-rated dental health. Binary outcomes (any oral health difficulty, loose teeth, gum disease history) were analysed using logistic regression, and ordinal outcomes (number of OHIP-14 impacts, dry mouth, self-rated dental health) using ordered logistic regression, with adjustment for sociodemographic, behavioural and oral hygiene covariates. RESULTS: Compared with never users, exclusive cigarette smokers had the highest adjusted odds of reporting any oral health difficulty (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.51-2.27), loose teeth (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.47-4.09), gum disease history (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.52-2.49) and poorer self-rated dental health (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 2.36-3.52). Dual users showed similarly elevated odds for loose teeth (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.95-4.97), the highest odds for gum disease history (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 2.06-4.99) and elevated odds for any oral health difficulty (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.04-2.30) and poorer self-rated dental health (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.68-3.58). Exclusive e-cigarette users also showed elevated odds across outcomes, though generally of smaller magnitude. Estimates for the very small subgroup of never-smoking current e-cigarette users did not show significant excess odds across outcomes, but were imprecise and should be regarded as exploratory. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional population-based analysis, combustible cigarette smoking and dual use were associated with poorer self-reported oral health outcomes. Findings related to e-cigarette use require cautious interpretation because of prior smoking history, the sparse never-smoker vaping subgroup and the absence of detailed exposure data (e.g., smoking intensity, pack-years, time since cessation, vaping duration, device type and nicotine concentration). Smoking cessation should remain central to preventive dentistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Diseases
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.70390
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous Oral Health Outcomes by Combustible Cigarette Smoking, E ‐Cigarette Use and Dual Use: A Cross‐Sectional Population‐Based Analysis

Roqayya Mohammed Ahmed Alhayyani, Isaac Olushola Ogunkola, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z. Alshahrani et al.
Oral Diseases
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Heterogeneous Oral Health Outcomes by Combustible Cigarette Smoking, E ‐Cigarette Use and Dual Use: A Cross‐Sectional Population‐Based Analysis

Roqayya Mohammed Ahmed Alhayyani, Isaac Olushola Ogunkola, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z. Alshahrani, Mohammed Moshabbab Alqahtani, Oshibe Joseph Daberechi, Waleed Almutairi, Anas Ali Alhur, Mona Majrashi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combustible cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for poor oral health, but the implications of e-cigarette use and dual use remain uncertain. Distinguishing the effects of vaping from the lingering consequences of prior smoking is a persistent challenge in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess how distinct nicotine use profiles relate to oral health-related quality of life, self-reported oral health indicators and self-rated dental health among adults in England, while differentiating e-cigarette users by smoking history. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 6027 adults (aged ≥ 16 years) from the nationally representative 2021 Adult Oral Health Survey for England. Participants were classified into five current smoking/vaping categories (never users, former smokers, exclusive cigarette smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, dual users) and, separately, by combined vaping-smoking history. Outcomes included any oral health difficulty and the number of impacts derived from the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), as well as loose teeth, gum disease history, dry mouth and self-rated dental health. Binary outcomes (any oral health difficulty, loose teeth, gum disease history) were analysed using logistic regression, and ordinal outcomes (number of OHIP-14 impacts, dry mouth, self-rated dental health) using ordered logistic regression, with adjustment for sociodemographic, behavioural and oral hygiene covariates. RESULTS: Compared with never users, exclusive cigarette smokers had the highest adjusted odds of reporting any oral health difficulty (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.51-2.27), loose teeth (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.47-4.09), gum disease history (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.52-2.49) and poorer self-rated dental health (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 2.36-3.52). Dual users showed similarly elevated odds for loose teeth (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.95-4.97), the highest odds for gum disease history (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 2.06-4.99) and elevated odds for any oral health difficulty (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.04-2.30) and poorer self-rated dental health (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.68-3.58). Exclusive e-cigarette users also showed elevated odds across outcomes, though generally of smaller magnitude. Estimates for the very small subgroup of never-smoking current e-cigarette users did not show significant excess odds across outcomes, but were imprecise and should be regarded as exploratory. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional population-based analysis, combustible cigarette smoking and dual use were associated with poorer self-reported oral health outcomes. Findings related to e-cigarette use require cautious interpretation because of prior smoking history, the sparse never-smoker vaping subgroup and the absence of detailed exposure data (e.g., smoking intensity, pack-years, time since cessation, vaping duration, device type and nicotine concentration). Smoking cessation should remain central to preventive dentistry.

Oral Diseases
University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Ha'il (SA), University of Jeddah (SA), King Fahd Military Medical Complex (SA), Innovation Cluster (Canada) (CA), Ministry of Health (MM), Asir Central Hospital (SA), University of Glasgow (GB), Ebonyi State University (NG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.