Enhanced Biomethane Recovery From Source‐Separated Cow Urine via Co‐Digestion With Waste Paper

ABSTRACT In this study, the biogas potential of source‐separated cow urine (CU) was evaluated through anaerobic co‐digestion with waste paper (WP) under mesophilic conditions (37°C ± 1°C) in batch mode. Anaerobic digestion performance was assessed in terms of biogas‐biomethane yields, total (TS) and volatile solids (VS) removal, pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA), soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), and carbon‐to‐nitrogen (C/N) ratios and compared with WP mono‐digestion. Five different blends were prepared in duplicate with an inoculum‐to‐substrate ratio of 1:1. The proportions were: 100% WP (CU 0 control), 90% WP + 10% CU (CU 10 ), 80% WP + 20% CU (CU 20 ), 70% WP + 30% CU (CU 30 ), and 50% WP + 50% CU (CU 50 ) operated over a 66‐day hydraulic retention time. The CU 50 bioreactor showed the highest efficiency, achieving 86% TS and 87% VS removal, and yielding 92.5% and 150% higher biogas and biomethane yields, respectively, compared with the control. The pH values and VFA concentrations of the bioreactors ranged from 5.395 to 7.83 and 1615.46 to 7280.02 mg L −1 , respectively. Effluent sCOD values in CU 30 , CU 20 , CU 10 , and CU 0 increased by 80.05, 111.07, 154.41, and 293.94 mg sCOD g −1 VS, respectively, relative to influent values, whereas CU 50 achieved 47.2 mg sCOD g −1 VS removal. Comparison of C/N ratios showed a 14.35% decrease in the control, whereas CU 50 achieved an optimal C/N ratio of 25.1312, facilitating biogas production. Co‐digesting source‐separated cow urine with waste office paper effectively enhanced biogas production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70153
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Biomethane Recovery From Source‐Separated Cow Urine via Co‐Digestion With Waste Paper

Ünal Şirin, Büşra Kabay
GCB Bioenergy
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Enhanced Biomethane Recovery From Source‐Separated Cow Urine via Co‐Digestion With Waste Paper

Ünal Şirin, Büşra Kabay
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, the biogas potential of source‐separated cow urine (CU) was evaluated through anaerobic co‐digestion with waste paper (WP) under mesophilic conditions (37°C ± 1°C) in batch mode. Anaerobic digestion performance was assessed in terms of biogas‐biomethane yields, total (TS) and volatile solids (VS) removal, pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA), soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), and carbon‐to‐nitrogen (C/N) ratios and compared with WP mono‐digestion. Five different blends were prepared in duplicate with an inoculum‐to‐substrate ratio of 1:1. The proportions were: 100% WP (CU 0 control), 90% WP + 10% CU (CU 10 ), 80% WP + 20% CU (CU 20 ), 70% WP + 30% CU (CU 30 ), and 50% WP + 50% CU (CU 50 ) operated over a 66‐day hydraulic retention time. The CU 50 bioreactor showed the highest efficiency, achieving 86% TS and 87% VS removal, and yielding 92.5% and 150% higher biogas and biomethane yields, respectively, compared with the control. The pH values and VFA concentrations of the bioreactors ranged from 5.395 to 7.83 and 1615.46 to 7280.02 mg L −1 , respectively. Effluent sCOD values in CU 30 , CU 20 , CU 10 , and CU 0 increased by 80.05, 111.07, 154.41, and 293.94 mg sCOD g −1 VS, respectively, relative to influent values, whereas CU 50 achieved 47.2 mg sCOD g −1 VS removal. Comparison of C/N ratios showed a 14.35% decrease in the control, whereas CU 50 achieved an optimal C/N ratio of 25.1312, facilitating biogas production. Co‐digesting source‐separated cow urine with waste office paper effectively enhanced biogas production.

GCB BioenergyVol. 18(7)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.