Gradient Boosting Revisited: Comparative Analysis of Selected Advances on Real-World Tabular Data

Gradient Boosting has become one of the approaches design to improve general predictive performance as well as overcome some specific learning challenges. Though mature, there are still new adaptive variants being created to enhance flexibility, efficiency, as well as overall predictive power. However, there are limited benchmarking studies that sought to establish the generalisation abilities of these techniques especially the newer variants under varying conditions. This study, therefore, conducts a systematic analysis of seven Gradient Boosting models: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, HistGradientBoosting, GradientBoosting, AdaBoost, and the adaptive MorphBoost on ten benchmark datasets different challenges. All models were trained using a fixed 80:20 train–test split, with 3-fold cross-validation performed solely on the training portion to estimate stability. Performance was measured using accuracy, F1-score, and ROC-AUC to guarantee fairness and reproducibility. The findings indicate that CatBoost produced the highest mean accuracy of 0.9400 and a near-perfect ROC-AUC of 0.9915, which means that it can effectively generalize across diverse data types. HistGradientBoosting is identified as the most stable model across datasets with a good level of performance and computational efficiency, and it is currently followed by LightGBM and XGBoost. MorphBoost shows promise on binary and high-dimensional datasets where its implementation is fully supported, though its current lack of native multiclass handling limits general applicability. Generally, the research confirms that there is no single model that fits all circumstances; rather, dataset characteristics directly influence model performance. These results offer real-world guidance on the choice of boosting models and point to the areas where future research, particularly in adaptive and hybrid boosting techniques can be used to further enhance performance and generalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Research
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mlr.20261101.14
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gradient Boosting Revisited: Comparative Analysis of Selected Advances on Real-World Tabular Data

Moses Apambila Agebure, Japheth Wiredu, Stephen Akobre
Machine Learning Research
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Gradient Boosting Revisited: Comparative Analysis of Selected Advances on Real-World Tabular Data

Moses Apambila Agebure, Japheth Wiredu, Stephen Akobre
article en

Abstract

Gradient Boosting has become one of the approaches design to improve general predictive performance as well as overcome some specific learning challenges. Though mature, there are still new adaptive variants being created to enhance flexibility, efficiency, as well as overall predictive power. However, there are limited benchmarking studies that sought to establish the generalisation abilities of these techniques especially the newer variants under varying conditions. This study, therefore, conducts a systematic analysis of seven Gradient Boosting models: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, HistGradientBoosting, GradientBoosting, AdaBoost, and the adaptive MorphBoost on ten benchmark datasets different challenges. All models were trained using a fixed 80:20 train–test split, with 3-fold cross-validation performed solely on the training portion to estimate stability. Performance was measured using accuracy, F1-score, and ROC-AUC to guarantee fairness and reproducibility. The findings indicate that CatBoost produced the highest mean accuracy of 0.9400 and a near-perfect ROC-AUC of 0.9915, which means that it can effectively generalize across diverse data types. HistGradientBoosting is identified as the most stable model across datasets with a good level of performance and computational efficiency, and it is currently followed by LightGBM and XGBoost. MorphBoost shows promise on binary and high-dimensional datasets where its implementation is fully supported, though its current lack of native multiclass handling limits general applicability. Generally, the research confirms that there is no single model that fits all circumstances; rather, dataset characteristics directly influence model performance. These results offer real-world guidance on the choice of boosting models and point to the areas where future research, particularly in adaptive and hybrid boosting techniques can be used to further enhance performance and generalization.

Machine Learning ResearchVol. 11(1)
Regent University College of Science and Technology (GH), Navrongo Health Research Centre (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.