From Salvageability to Lethality: Bridging Vascular Trauma Surgery and Forensic Medicine Through an Evidence-informed Forensic–Vascular Salvageability Index – A Narrative Review

Abstract Severe traumatic hemorrhage is a dominant pathway to early death after injury, with a substantial proportion of early mortality attributable to exsanguination and major vascular disruption in both civilian and military datasets. Contemporary vascular-trauma care has improved survival through rapid hemorrhage control, damage-control resuscitation, and structured algorithms for extremity and truncal vascular injury management. In parallel, forensic medicine must reconstruct the cause, mechanism, and manner of death using scene context, medical records, and postmortem findings, including increasingly postmortem cross-sectional and angiographic imaging. However, the conceptual and practical “translation layer” between clinical salvageability (what could have been survivable with timely vascular control and resuscitation) and forensic lethality reconstruction (how the injury produced fatal physiology and what can be proven from postmortem evidence) is not standardized. This narrative review synthesizes vascular-trauma decision principles and forensic death-investigation standards to propose an evidence-informed framework – the Forensic–Vascular Salvageability Index (FVSI) – that jointly characterizes vascular injury along three axes: (1) Clinical Salvageability (feasibility and time-dependence of hemorrhage control and revascularization), (2) Forensic Lethality Reconstruction (strength of evidence that hemorrhage and vascular disruption were the proximate fatal pathway), and (3) Context/Timeline Modifiers (delays, compressibility, and system capability). FVSI is presented as a prototype scoring rubric and reporting template supported by tables and implementation scenarios intended to enable research harmonization, improve medicolegal communication, and support preventable-death review without substituting for clinical judgment or legal determinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Saudi Journal of Forensic Medicine and Sciences
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjfms.sjfms_5_26
Primary Topic
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Salvageability to Lethality: Bridging Vascular Trauma Surgery and Forensic Medicine Through an Evidence-informed Forensic–Vascular Salvageability Index – A Narrative Review

Faisal Mohammed Alzubaidi, Reda Abdallah Jamjoom, Sultan Osama Khoja, Abdullah M. Abdullah et al.
The Saudi Journal of Forensic Medicine and Sciences
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
article

From Salvageability to Lethality: Bridging Vascular Trauma Surgery and Forensic Medicine Through an Evidence-informed Forensic–Vascular Salvageability Index – A Narrative Review

Faisal Mohammed Alzubaidi, Reda Abdallah Jamjoom, Sultan Osama Khoja, Abdullah M. Abdullah, Elsayed Abdelfatah Younes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Severe traumatic hemorrhage is a dominant pathway to early death after injury, with a substantial proportion of early mortality attributable to exsanguination and major vascular disruption in both civilian and military datasets. Contemporary vascular-trauma care has improved survival through rapid hemorrhage control, damage-control resuscitation, and structured algorithms for extremity and truncal vascular injury management. In parallel, forensic medicine must reconstruct the cause, mechanism, and manner of death using scene context, medical records, and postmortem findings, including increasingly postmortem cross-sectional and angiographic imaging. However, the conceptual and practical “translation layer” between clinical salvageability (what could have been survivable with timely vascular control and resuscitation) and forensic lethality reconstruction (how the injury produced fatal physiology and what can be proven from postmortem evidence) is not standardized. This narrative review synthesizes vascular-trauma decision principles and forensic death-investigation standards to propose an evidence-informed framework – the Forensic–Vascular Salvageability Index (FVSI) – that jointly characterizes vascular injury along three axes: (1) Clinical Salvageability (feasibility and time-dependence of hemorrhage control and revascularization), (2) Forensic Lethality Reconstruction (strength of evidence that hemorrhage and vascular disruption were the proximate fatal pathway), and (3) Context/Timeline Modifiers (delays, compressibility, and system capability). FVSI is presented as a prototype scoring rubric and reporting template supported by tables and implementation scenarios intended to enable research harmonization, improve medicolegal communication, and support preventable-death review without substituting for clinical judgment or legal determinations.

The Saudi Journal of Forensic Medicine and Sciences
King Abdulaziz University (SA), King Fahd Security College (SA), King Abdulaziz Hospital (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.