The Survival Instinct in Management and Organizational Practice: A Genealogy of Unfalsifiability

This working paper examines the survival instinct as it operates in management and organizational practice -- tracing its genealogy through philosophy, economics, psychoanalysis, and neuroscience, and evaluating the evidence from evolutionary biology, anthropology, and cognitive neuroscience that complicates a survival-instinct-centered account of human behavior. The paper argues that the framework, as currently deployed, is structured in ways that make falsification difficult: individuation of the problem locates malfunction inside the individual rather than in structural conditions, and a persistent literal/figurative ambiguity allows the framework to claim scientific authority while retreating to metaphor when challenged empirically. The practical implications for organizational practice, leadership development, and research design are examined. The paper is the first output of Human Evolution Lab (HEvLab) and clears the ground for a companion framework, Protective Design, which proposes a more empirically adequate alternative grounded in continuity-preservation rather than survival competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20674398
Primary Topic
Management Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Survival Instinct in Management and Organizational Practice: A Genealogy of Unfalsifiability

Anne Burlinson
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Management Theory and Practice
article

The Survival Instinct in Management and Organizational Practice: A Genealogy of Unfalsifiability

Anne Burlinson
article en

Abstract

This working paper examines the survival instinct as it operates in management and organizational practice -- tracing its genealogy through philosophy, economics, psychoanalysis, and neuroscience, and evaluating the evidence from evolutionary biology, anthropology, and cognitive neuroscience that complicates a survival-instinct-centered account of human behavior. The paper argues that the framework, as currently deployed, is structured in ways that make falsification difficult: individuation of the problem locates malfunction inside the individual rather than in structural conditions, and a persistent literal/figurative ambiguity allows the framework to claim scientific authority while retreating to metaphor when challenged empirically. The practical implications for organizational practice, leadership development, and research design are examined. The paper is the first output of Human Evolution Lab (HEvLab) and clears the ground for a companion framework, Protective Design, which proposes a more empirically adequate alternative grounded in continuity-preservation rather than survival competition.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Management Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.