Entanglement, EPR and Bell in Time-Actualization: Correlations as the Structure of the Future, and an Einstein 1905-1935 Bridge

Version note (v2, 2026-06-10): corrected and pruned English successor to the earlier French version. It removes earlier over-claims -- a 'derivation' of the Tsirelson bound, a tempo-dependent signature of the Bell violation, and a renormalization-group account of Tsirelson -- and restates the correlations, the Tsirelson bound and the Born weights as IMPORTED from quantum mechanics, never derived. Time-Actualization is empirically equivalent to quantum mechanics (no distinctive prediction). Time-Actualization (TA) reads quantum mechanics as the potential future, the relativistic causal record as the actualized past, and the present as the act of actualization. Entanglement is the non-factorizability of the joint future rho_AB, not pre-existing values. EPR's 'element of reality' confuses predictability within rho with a fact within the causal past; once distinguished, incompleteness dissolves without hidden variables and without superluminal influence. Bell's violated inequality refutes pre-actualized local realism, not operational locality (no-signalling, the imported microcausality of the substrate). A structural bridge: Einstein's 1905 light-quantum argument and the 1935 EPR argument are two forms of one ontological slippage -- mistaking the structure of the possible for the status of the real.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20678762
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Entanglement, EPR and Bell in Time-Actualization: Correlations as the Structure of the Future, and an Einstein 1905-1935 Bridge

Patrick Jaubert
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

Entanglement, EPR and Bell in Time-Actualization: Correlations as the Structure of the Future, and an Einstein 1905-1935 Bridge

Patrick Jaubert
preprint en

Abstract

Version note (v2, 2026-06-10): corrected and pruned English successor to the earlier French version. It removes earlier over-claims -- a 'derivation' of the Tsirelson bound, a tempo-dependent signature of the Bell violation, and a renormalization-group account of Tsirelson -- and restates the correlations, the Tsirelson bound and the Born weights as IMPORTED from quantum mechanics, never derived. Time-Actualization is empirically equivalent to quantum mechanics (no distinctive prediction). Time-Actualization (TA) reads quantum mechanics as the potential future, the relativistic causal record as the actualized past, and the present as the act of actualization. Entanglement is the non-factorizability of the joint future rho_AB, not pre-existing values. EPR's 'element of reality' confuses predictability within rho with a fact within the causal past; once distinguished, incompleteness dissolves without hidden variables and without superluminal influence. Bell's violated inequality refutes pre-actualized local realism, not operational locality (no-signalling, the imported microcausality of the substrate). A structural bridge: Einstein's 1905 light-quantum argument and the 1935 EPR argument are two forms of one ontological slippage -- mistaking the structure of the possible for the status of the real.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.