Impact of input subsidies on technical efficiency of smallholder maize producers in North Eastern Zimbabwe: a propensity score matching approach

Despite extensive global research on subsidies in agriculture, empirical evidence on their impacts on smallholder technical efficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe remains scarce, limiting contextually relevant policy insights. In this study, we empirically analyze the impact of input subsidies on the technical efficiency of smallholder maize farmers using a randomly selected sample of 408 farmers in northeastern Zimbabwe. Technical efficiency was estimated using a translog stochastic frontier specification, while propensity score matching was employed to account for confounding factors in the impact evaluation. The overall mean technical efficiency across the sampled smallholder farms was 0.66, signifying a substantial untapped productivity potential. Technical inefficiency increased with farmer age, subsidy amount, and arable land size but decreased with greater maize farming experience, frequent extension contact, and livestock ownership. Critically, we found evidence that input subsidies negatively impact the technical efficiency of smallholder maize farmers in northeastern Zimbabwe. Smallholder farmers can boost productivity without expanding inputs by adopting efficient practices in the short term. This necessitates strengthening extension systems by increasing visits, quality, and coverage to disseminate best practices for input optimization. Concurrently, livestock’s efficiency gains warrant targeted veterinary support systems to reduce cattle mortality rates. The indefinite nature of the Pfumvudza input subsidy program fosters dependency and exacerbates technical inefficiency. Hence, we recommend transitioning to a rigorous, time-bound subsidy framework starting with full support, followed by a 50% subsidy reduction coupled with low-interest loans, and finally complete phase-out. Without reform, current subsidies risk perpetuating the inefficiencies they aim to resolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2026.2685953
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of input subsidies on technical efficiency of smallholder maize producers in North Eastern Zimbabwe: a propensity score matching approach

Abbyssinia Mushunje, Freddy Ruzhani
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Impact of input subsidies on technical efficiency of smallholder maize producers in North Eastern Zimbabwe: a propensity score matching approach

Abbyssinia Mushunje, Freddy Ruzhani
article en

Abstract

Despite extensive global research on subsidies in agriculture, empirical evidence on their impacts on smallholder technical efficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe remains scarce, limiting contextually relevant policy insights. In this study, we empirically analyze the impact of input subsidies on the technical efficiency of smallholder maize farmers using a randomly selected sample of 408 farmers in northeastern Zimbabwe. Technical efficiency was estimated using a translog stochastic frontier specification, while propensity score matching was employed to account for confounding factors in the impact evaluation. The overall mean technical efficiency across the sampled smallholder farms was 0.66, signifying a substantial untapped productivity potential. Technical inefficiency increased with farmer age, subsidy amount, and arable land size but decreased with greater maize farming experience, frequent extension contact, and livestock ownership. Critically, we found evidence that input subsidies negatively impact the technical efficiency of smallholder maize farmers in northeastern Zimbabwe. Smallholder farmers can boost productivity without expanding inputs by adopting efficient practices in the short term. This necessitates strengthening extension systems by increasing visits, quality, and coverage to disseminate best practices for input optimization. Concurrently, livestock’s efficiency gains warrant targeted veterinary support systems to reduce cattle mortality rates. The indefinite nature of the Pfumvudza input subsidy program fosters dependency and exacerbates technical inefficiency. Hence, we recommend transitioning to a rigorous, time-bound subsidy framework starting with full support, followed by a 50% subsidy reduction coupled with low-interest loans, and finally complete phase-out. Without reform, current subsidies risk perpetuating the inefficiencies they aim to resolve.

Cogent Food & AgricultureVol. 12(1)
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of input subsidies on technical efficiency of smallholder maize producers in North Eastern Zimbabwe: a propensity score matching approach — Abbyssinia Mushunje, Freddy Ruzhani · Cogent Food & Agriculture (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS