Cognitive engagement and video watching behaviours in learner-controlled environments: A cognitive load perspective

Research on video-based learning often relies on behavioural indicators to infer engagement, yet it remains unclear whether these behaviours reflect meaningful cognitive engagement or mere activity. To address this gap the present study analysed relationships between time-on-video, click frequency, playback speed manipulation, and learners’ intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load in a learner-controlled video environment (N = 96). Time-on-video and click frequency showed no associations with cognitive load, however, playback speed manipulation did. Slowing down videos was associated with lower intrinsic load, speeding up videos with higher germane load, and both forms of speed adjustment with lower extraneous load. The findings demonstrate how cognitive load theory can be used to interpret digital trace data to distinguish between behavioural activity and cognitively meaningful engagement. Researchers and practitioners should therefore interpret coarse indicators such as viewing time and click frequency with caution and give greater attention to pacing-related behaviours when using trace data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2026.2687014
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive engagement and video watching behaviours in learner-controlled environments: A cognitive load perspective

Aleksandra Getman, Jamie Costley, Ксения Адамович, Anna Gorbunova et al.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Cognitive engagement and video watching behaviours in learner-controlled environments: A cognitive load perspective

Aleksandra Getman, Jamie Costley, Ксения Адамович, Anna Gorbunova, Alexander Savelyev
article en

Abstract

Research on video-based learning often relies on behavioural indicators to infer engagement, yet it remains unclear whether these behaviours reflect meaningful cognitive engagement or mere activity. To address this gap the present study analysed relationships between time-on-video, click frequency, playback speed manipulation, and learners’ intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load in a learner-controlled video environment (N = 96). Time-on-video and click frequency showed no associations with cognitive load, however, playback speed manipulation did. Slowing down videos was associated with lower intrinsic load, speeding up videos with higher germane load, and both forms of speed adjustment with lower extraneous load. The findings demonstrate how cognitive load theory can be used to interpret digital trace data to distinguish between behavioural activity and cognitively meaningful engagement. Researchers and practitioners should therefore interpret coarse indicators such as viewing time and click frequency with caution and give greater attention to pacing-related behaviours when using trace data.

Innovations in Education and Teaching International
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive engagement and video watching behaviours in learner-controlled environments: A cognitive load perspective — Aleksandra Getman, Jamie Costley, et al. · Innovations in Education and Teaching International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS