Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for optic nerve sheath meningiomas: A single-center experience and preliminary results

Primary optic nerve sheath meningioma (pONSM) causes progressive vision loss. Surgery carries high morbidity (~ 94% visual impairment), and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT; 50.4–54 Gy) requires an extended course. Given the low α/β ratio of meningiomas (~ 3.76 Gy), we investigated hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hypo-FSRT; 40 Gy/10 fx) as an alternative. This retrospective STROBE-compliant study (2016–2023) included imaging-confirmed pONSM patients (PS 0–2) unsuitable for or refusing surgery/CFRT. Hypo-FSRT delivered via gamma-ray system with thermoplastic immobilization. PTV = GTV + 3 mm, prescribed to 60% isodose. OAR constraints: optic chiasm/retina/pituitary Dmax ≤ 25 Gy. Visual acuity assessed by Snellen; regression defined as ≥ 1 mm reduction on consecutive MRIs. Statistics: paired t-tests, chi-square, logistic regression (OR, 95% CI), Kaplan-Meier with log-rank; p < 0.05 significant. Progression: any increase in axial/sagittal diameter on ≥ 2 consecutive MRIs. Local control: no progression at last follow-up. Baseline visual impairment duration categorized as acute (≤ 2 months onset-to-RT) or chronic (> 2 months). 43 patients were included (median follow-up 59 months). Overall vision preservation was 30.2% (13/43). Preservation rates by baseline status: normal 40% (4/10), mild loss 63.6% (7/11), moderate loss 12.5% (1/8), severe loss 7.1% (1/14). Age (OR = 4.21) and mild baseline loss (OR = 7.89) predicted preservation. Tumor control was 100%, regression 76.7% (higher in females: 85.3% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.020). Acute toxicity: reversible ocular pain (16.3%), eyelid edema (13.9%); late retinal hemorrhage (7.0%). No secondary malignancies. Time to blindness was shorter with moderate/severe vs. normal/mild baseline loss ( p < 0.001). In post-hoc analysis, acute visual loss (≤ 2 months) showed higher preservation than chronic loss (> 2 months) (62.5% [5/8] vs. 22.9% [8/35]; OR = 5.36). All acute cases were in normal/mild baseline subgroup (preservation: 75.0% and 80.0%, respectively). Hypo-FSRT yielded 100% tumor control and 76.7% regression, but lower vision preservation (30.2%) than CFRT, particularly with moderate/severe baseline loss. Acute impairment (≤ 2 months) predicts better preservation. Low preservation with normal baseline vision necessitates individualized planning balancing tumor control, vision, and cosmesis. CFRT preferred for vision preservation; optimal fractionation needs prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02873-2
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for optic nerve sheath meningiomas: A single-center experience and preliminary results

Yuanyou Yang, 罗凤霞, Yi Wang, Gang Ren et al.
Radiation Oncology
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for optic nerve sheath meningiomas: A single-center experience and preliminary results

Yuanyou Yang, 罗凤霞, Yi Wang, Gang Ren, Chao Wang
article en

Abstract

Primary optic nerve sheath meningioma (pONSM) causes progressive vision loss. Surgery carries high morbidity (~ 94% visual impairment), and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT; 50.4–54 Gy) requires an extended course. Given the low α/β ratio of meningiomas (~ 3.76 Gy), we investigated hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hypo-FSRT; 40 Gy/10 fx) as an alternative. This retrospective STROBE-compliant study (2016–2023) included imaging-confirmed pONSM patients (PS 0–2) unsuitable for or refusing surgery/CFRT. Hypo-FSRT delivered via gamma-ray system with thermoplastic immobilization. PTV = GTV + 3 mm, prescribed to 60% isodose. OAR constraints: optic chiasm/retina/pituitary Dmax ≤ 25 Gy. Visual acuity assessed by Snellen; regression defined as ≥ 1 mm reduction on consecutive MRIs. Statistics: paired t-tests, chi-square, logistic regression (OR, 95% CI), Kaplan-Meier with log-rank; p < 0.05 significant. Progression: any increase in axial/sagittal diameter on ≥ 2 consecutive MRIs. Local control: no progression at last follow-up. Baseline visual impairment duration categorized as acute (≤ 2 months onset-to-RT) or chronic (> 2 months). 43 patients were included (median follow-up 59 months). Overall vision preservation was 30.2% (13/43). Preservation rates by baseline status: normal 40% (4/10), mild loss 63.6% (7/11), moderate loss 12.5% (1/8), severe loss 7.1% (1/14). Age (OR = 4.21) and mild baseline loss (OR = 7.89) predicted preservation. Tumor control was 100%, regression 76.7% (higher in females: 85.3% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.020). Acute toxicity: reversible ocular pain (16.3%), eyelid edema (13.9%); late retinal hemorrhage (7.0%). No secondary malignancies. Time to blindness was shorter with moderate/severe vs. normal/mild baseline loss ( p < 0.001). In post-hoc analysis, acute visual loss (≤ 2 months) showed higher preservation than chronic loss (> 2 months) (62.5% [5/8] vs. 22.9% [8/35]; OR = 5.36). All acute cases were in normal/mild baseline subgroup (preservation: 75.0% and 80.0%, respectively). Hypo-FSRT yielded 100% tumor control and 76.7% regression, but lower vision preservation (30.2%) than CFRT, particularly with moderate/severe baseline loss. Acute impairment (≤ 2 months) predicts better preservation. Low preservation with normal baseline vision necessitates individualized planning balancing tumor control, vision, and cosmesis. CFRT preferred for vision preservation; optimal fractionation needs prospective validation.

Radiation Oncology
Peking University (CN), Peking University Shougang Hospital (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.