Policy, practice, and representation: a critical discourse analysis of Victoria’s Easy English Inclusive Education policy

This article presents a critical discourse analysis of Victoria’s inclusive education policy regarding disability, examining its online multimodal Easy English version through Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach and Kress’s multimodal analysis. Despite decades of policy reform aimed at fostering inclusive education, a gap between policy rhetoric and practical implementation persists. We critically examine the visual and textual elements to investigate how language and multimodal representations in policy documents shape or consolidate understandings of disability and implementation of inclusion. The analysis reveals how institutional documents may reflect an underlying discourse of deficit or construct disempowering practices. This research contributes to ongoing scholarly debate about policy discourse in developing understandings of inclusive practices. The findings highlight the need to attend to discourse and representation within the complex interplay between policy language, institutional practices, and educational outcomes for students with disabilities in Victorian schools. This study emphasises the importance of addressing such issues for effective educational inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2026.2683437
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy, practice, and representation: a critical discourse analysis of Victoria’s Easy English Inclusive Education policy

Alina Kewanian, Edwin Creely, Jane Southcott
Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Policy, practice, and representation: a critical discourse analysis of Victoria’s Easy English Inclusive Education policy

Alina Kewanian, Edwin Creely, Jane Southcott
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical discourse analysis of Victoria’s inclusive education policy regarding disability, examining its online multimodal Easy English version through Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach and Kress’s multimodal analysis. Despite decades of policy reform aimed at fostering inclusive education, a gap between policy rhetoric and practical implementation persists. We critically examine the visual and textual elements to investigate how language and multimodal representations in policy documents shape or consolidate understandings of disability and implementation of inclusion. The analysis reveals how institutional documents may reflect an underlying discourse of deficit or construct disempowering practices. This research contributes to ongoing scholarly debate about policy discourse in developing understandings of inclusive practices. The findings highlight the need to attend to discourse and representation within the complex interplay between policy language, institutional practices, and educational outcomes for students with disabilities in Victorian schools. This study emphasises the importance of addressing such issues for effective educational inclusion.

Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.