Development, Falsification, and Mathematical Audit of the LMS/SBQM Model

This deposit documents the development, falsification history, mathematical audit, and reproducibility package for the LMS/SBQM model, a finite-symmetry organising framework explored for fermion-mass regularities, hadron-sector diagnostics, and selected sealed predictions. The archive contains the main article in PDF and LaTeX format, a complete ZIP package with supporting files, metadata, reproducibility material, prediction and falsification registers, supplementary audit material, and a dedicated SP-N1 sharpness note. The purpose of the deposit is to provide a transparent, reproducible record of the model-development process, including both positive results and negative/falsifying results. The work treats the 600-cell / binary icosahedral structure as a finite symmetry organiser and behavioural-parameter structure, not as a literal physical substrate. Claims are separated by evidential status: theorem-level mathematical structure, reproduced numerical regularities, candidate dynamics, sealed predictions, falsifications, and open gates. A central methodological feature of the deposit is that falsifications and failed derivation attempts are reported as primary results. The archive therefore includes not only surviving model components, but also documented exclusions, downgraded claims, and anti-overclaim notes. The SP-N1 sharpness note is included as a required interpretive correction. It clarifies that the predicted neutrino mass sum near 59 meV lies close to the normal-ordering oscillation minimum and is therefore a weak confirmation channel on its own. The genuinely model-specific SP-N1 commitments are the lightest neutrino mass, the neutrino Koide-like value, the Majorana requirement, and the neutrinoless double-beta decay effective-mass interval. This deposit should not be cited as a completed fundamental theory of mass, a replacement for the Standard Model or QCD, a claim that cosmology has measured Σmν = 59 meV, or a proof that the 600-cell is a literal physical medium. It is best understood as a development, audit, and reproducibility record for a speculative but systematically tested finite-symmetry mass-model programme. Main components:- Main article: Development, Falsification, and Mathematical Audit of the LMS/SBQM Model- LaTeX source of the article- Full Zenodo package with data, scripts, metadata, registers, supplementary files, and audit material- SP-N1 Sharpness Note- Prediction and falsification registers- Reproducibility and provenance material Creator:J. M. ChristiansenORCID: 0009-0001-8846-9051 Version:v1.2.0 Date:2026-06-13

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20677694
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Development, Falsification, and Mathematical Audit of the LMS/SBQM Model

Johny Christiansen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
preprint

Development, Falsification, and Mathematical Audit of the LMS/SBQM Model

Johny Christiansen
preprint en

Abstract

This deposit documents the development, falsification history, mathematical audit, and reproducibility package for the LMS/SBQM model, a finite-symmetry organising framework explored for fermion-mass regularities, hadron-sector diagnostics, and selected sealed predictions. The archive contains the main article in PDF and LaTeX format, a complete ZIP package with supporting files, metadata, reproducibility material, prediction and falsification registers, supplementary audit material, and a dedicated SP-N1 sharpness note. The purpose of the deposit is to provide a transparent, reproducible record of the model-development process, including both positive results and negative/falsifying results. The work treats the 600-cell / binary icosahedral structure as a finite symmetry organiser and behavioural-parameter structure, not as a literal physical substrate. Claims are separated by evidential status: theorem-level mathematical structure, reproduced numerical regularities, candidate dynamics, sealed predictions, falsifications, and open gates. A central methodological feature of the deposit is that falsifications and failed derivation attempts are reported as primary results. The archive therefore includes not only surviving model components, but also documented exclusions, downgraded claims, and anti-overclaim notes. The SP-N1 sharpness note is included as a required interpretive correction. It clarifies that the predicted neutrino mass sum near 59 meV lies close to the normal-ordering oscillation minimum and is therefore a weak confirmation channel on its own. The genuinely model-specific SP-N1 commitments are the lightest neutrino mass, the neutrino Koide-like value, the Majorana requirement, and the neutrinoless double-beta decay effective-mass interval. This deposit should not be cited as a completed fundamental theory of mass, a replacement for the Standard Model or QCD, a claim that cosmology has measured Σmν = 59 meV, or a proof that the 600-cell is a literal physical medium. It is best understood as a development, audit, and reproducibility record for a speculative but systematically tested finite-symmetry mass-model programme. Main components:- Main article: Development, Falsification, and Mathematical Audit of the LMS/SBQM Model- LaTeX source of the article- Full Zenodo package with data, scripts, metadata, registers, supplementary files, and audit material- SP-N1 Sharpness Note- Prediction and falsification registers- Reproducibility and provenance material Creator:J. M. ChristiansenORCID: 0009-0001-8846-9051 Version:v1.2.0 Date:2026-06-13

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.