TENSOSTASIS, EMERGENT TIME, AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci's Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 in confrontation with

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci’s Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 (TIT) (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Ingusci’s model of emergent physical time as a result of informational tension, friction, and dissipation among relational states, formally articulated through Jensen–Shannon divergence, Fisher–Rao geometry, and the variational principle of Tensostasis. The analysis argues that TIT establishes a significant field of dialogue with TO because both frameworks reject the absolute fundamentality of physical time and emphasize relation, boundary, tension, informational emergence, and structural convergence. Particular attention is given to the compatibility between TIT and the modal axioms of TO, especially boundary, recursive composition, and the transcendent element understood in TO as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies important points of tension. TIT begins from already constituted informational states, whereas TO requires a modal-cosmogonic deduction from the logical spherical Nothing. TIT also formalizes mainly the reductive movement of tension toward equilibrium, while TO requires the joint articulation of expansive and reductive Inducer Effects. Therefore, the article proposes that TIT should not be read as a substitute for the cosmogonic theorem of TO, but as a potentially useful auxiliary model for operationalizing temporalization through informational tension in already differentiated systems. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Alessandro Ingusci; Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time; TIT V4.2; Tensostasis; emergent time; informational friction; Jensen–Shannon divergence; Fisher–Rao geometry; modal ontology; logical spherical Nothing; Inducer Effects; atomic radiation; transcendent substance; cosmology; philosophy of physics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20683255
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TENSOSTASIS, EMERGENT TIME, AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci's Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 in confrontation with

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

TENSOSTASIS, EMERGENT TIME, AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci's Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 in confrontation with

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci’s Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 (TIT) (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Ingusci’s model of emergent physical time as a result of informational tension, friction, and dissipation among relational states, formally articulated through Jensen–Shannon divergence, Fisher–Rao geometry, and the variational principle of Tensostasis. The analysis argues that TIT establishes a significant field of dialogue with TO because both frameworks reject the absolute fundamentality of physical time and emphasize relation, boundary, tension, informational emergence, and structural convergence. Particular attention is given to the compatibility between TIT and the modal axioms of TO, especially boundary, recursive composition, and the transcendent element understood in TO as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies important points of tension. TIT begins from already constituted informational states, whereas TO requires a modal-cosmogonic deduction from the logical spherical Nothing. TIT also formalizes mainly the reductive movement of tension toward equilibrium, while TO requires the joint articulation of expansive and reductive Inducer Effects. Therefore, the article proposes that TIT should not be read as a substitute for the cosmogonic theorem of TO, but as a potentially useful auxiliary model for operationalizing temporalization through informational tension in already differentiated systems. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Alessandro Ingusci; Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time; TIT V4.2; Tensostasis; emergent time; informational friction; Jensen–Shannon divergence; Fisher–Rao geometry; modal ontology; logical spherical Nothing; Inducer Effects; atomic radiation; transcendent substance; cosmology; philosophy of physics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.