Discovering new techniques for how organizations can earn their employees’ loyalty

Purpose This research aims to identify the antecedents to organizations earning employee loyalty (EEL) and develops a measure of how an organization signals loyalty to its employees, individually and collectively, in ways that its employees see as a fair, desirable and appropriate return for their contributions. This scale significantly improves upon existing conceptual loyalty measures to identify individual employees’ perceptions of specific antecedent organizational actions and policies that will generate and sustain the employee’s loyalty. Design/methodology/approach This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design across three phases. Study I used qualitative methods to identify employee expectations of organizational actions, policies and leader communications, generating an initial pool of scale items. Study II tested the factor structure, reliability and nomological validity of the EEL scale through exploratory factor analysis. Study III validated the final scale using confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical regression, comparing its predictive value against established constructs such as job satisfaction and perceived organizational support (POS). Findings Traditional measures such as POS (Eisenberger et al., 1986) and job satisfaction scales no longer fully capture today’s evolving employer–employee relationships including newer employee expectations such as differential accommodations. These tools provide limited insight into specific actions organizations can take to foster loyalty. In contrast, the EEL scale offers a holistic assessment by measuring employee perceptions across thematic categories – such as growth, accommodations and shared values – directly linked to loyalty, providing organizations with clearer guidance for improvement. Final testing demonstrated the EEL scale is significantly better than existing traditional predictors of loyalty such as job satisfaction and POS at predicting. Originality/value This research offers and tests prescriptive actions organizations can take to proactively earn employee loyalty and reduce attrition. Unlike traditional scales, which measure loyalty post hoc, this study provides a forward-looking framework to help organizations anticipate and address employee needs before disengagement occurs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Research Review
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-10-2025-0781
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discovering new techniques for how organizations can earn their employees’ loyalty

Sean A. Newman, Ginger Killian, Robert C. Ford, Suzanne Altobello
Management Research Review
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

Discovering new techniques for how organizations can earn their employees’ loyalty

Sean A. Newman, Ginger Killian, Robert C. Ford, Suzanne Altobello
article en

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to identify the antecedents to organizations earning employee loyalty (EEL) and develops a measure of how an organization signals loyalty to its employees, individually and collectively, in ways that its employees see as a fair, desirable and appropriate return for their contributions. This scale significantly improves upon existing conceptual loyalty measures to identify individual employees’ perceptions of specific antecedent organizational actions and policies that will generate and sustain the employee’s loyalty. Design/methodology/approach This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design across three phases. Study I used qualitative methods to identify employee expectations of organizational actions, policies and leader communications, generating an initial pool of scale items. Study II tested the factor structure, reliability and nomological validity of the EEL scale through exploratory factor analysis. Study III validated the final scale using confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical regression, comparing its predictive value against established constructs such as job satisfaction and perceived organizational support (POS). Findings Traditional measures such as POS (Eisenberger et al., 1986) and job satisfaction scales no longer fully capture today’s evolving employer–employee relationships including newer employee expectations such as differential accommodations. These tools provide limited insight into specific actions organizations can take to foster loyalty. In contrast, the EEL scale offers a holistic assessment by measuring employee perceptions across thematic categories – such as growth, accommodations and shared values – directly linked to loyalty, providing organizations with clearer guidance for improvement. Final testing demonstrated the EEL scale is significantly better than existing traditional predictors of loyalty such as job satisfaction and POS at predicting. Originality/value This research offers and tests prescriptive actions organizations can take to proactively earn employee loyalty and reduce attrition. Unlike traditional scales, which measure loyalty post hoc, this study provides a forward-looking framework to help organizations anticipate and address employee needs before disengagement occurs.

Management Research Review
University of Central Florida (US), University of North Carolina at Pembroke (US), Rollins College (US), Stetson University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.