Photoacoustic device fingerprints induce bias in deep learning models

Abstract Deep learning (DL) models developed for established medical imaging modalities have shown increasing performance and reliability as a result of scaling efforts. In contrast, model development for emerging modalities such as photoacoustic imaging (PAI) remains challenged by data sparsity, which limits model generalizability and raises the susceptibility to bias. While recent studies in PAI have started to investigate subject-related confounders, the impact of hardware-related confounders remains unexplored, posing a critical risk for failure in multicentric deployment scenarios. We are the first to provide a multicentric analysis of hardware-induced bias in PAI. We analyzed device-specific characteristics in images from four device instances and two peripheral artery disease studies, and trained DL models to classify device origin and disease under varying levels of device–health correlations in the data. We showed that 1) multiple instances of the same PAI device type embed identifiable fingerprints in the images, 2) that DL models can leverage these fingerprints to reach $$100\,\%$$ accuracy in device detection and critically, 3) when a correlation between device instance and health status is present, models trained for disease diagnosis exploit these device-specific signatures as shortcuts, thereby producing biased and clinically misleading predictions. This research highlights the risk of overestimating algorithm performance when such confounding is overlooked, emphasizing the importance of bias evaluation and explainable artificial intelligence methods to identify potential shortcuts, finally enabling multicentric PAI studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53468-6
Primary Topic
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Photoacoustic device fingerprints induce bias in deep learning models

Niklas Holzwarth, Lena Maier‐Hein, Jan-Hinrich Nölke, Ferdinand Knieling et al.
Scientific Reports
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
article

Photoacoustic device fingerprints induce bias in deep learning models

Niklas Holzwarth, Lena Maier‐Hein, Jan-Hinrich Nölke, Ferdinand Knieling, Leonie Boland, Tom Rix, Ulrich Rother, Alexander Seitel, Christoph J Bender, Milenko Caranovic, Yi Li, Melanie Schellenberg, Marcel Knopp, Julius Kempf, Briain Haney, Fabian Schneider, Kris K. Dreher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Deep learning (DL) models developed for established medical imaging modalities have shown increasing performance and reliability as a result of scaling efforts. In contrast, model development for emerging modalities such as photoacoustic imaging (PAI) remains challenged by data sparsity, which limits model generalizability and raises the susceptibility to bias. While recent studies in PAI have started to investigate subject-related confounders, the impact of hardware-related confounders remains unexplored, posing a critical risk for failure in multicentric deployment scenarios. We are the first to provide a multicentric analysis of hardware-induced bias in PAI. We analyzed device-specific characteristics in images from four device instances and two peripheral artery disease studies, and trained DL models to classify device origin and disease under varying levels of device–health correlations in the data. We showed that 1) multiple instances of the same PAI device type embed identifiable fingerprints in the images, 2) that DL models can leverage these fingerprints to reach $$100\,\%$$ accuracy in device detection and critically, 3) when a correlation between device instance and health status is present, models trained for disease diagnosis exploit these device-specific signatures as shortcuts, thereby producing biased and clinically misleading predictions. This research highlights the risk of overestimating algorithm performance when such confounding is overlooked, emphasizing the importance of bias evaluation and explainable artificial intelligence methods to identify potential shortcuts, finally enabling multicentric PAI studies.

Scientific Reports
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.