Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Reattachment Techniques and Adhesives: An In Vitro Study

AbstractBackground: Traumatic fractures of anterior teeth are common and can adversely affect aesthetics, function, and psychological well being. Fragment reattachment is a conservative treatment modality, and its success largely depends on the reattachment technique and bonding system used.Aim: To evaluate and compare the fracture strength of reattached anterior tooth fragments using external chamfer and internal dentinal groove techniques with 5th and 7th generation bonding agents.Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted maxillary anterior teeth were selected and divided into three groups: external chamfer (n=32), internal dentinal groove (n=32), and control (n=16).Experimental groups were further subdivided based on the bonding agent used. Standardized incisal fractures were created, and fragments were reattached using the respective techniques.Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using SPSS with one way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, and Student's t-test at a significance level of p < 0.05.Results: The control group showed the highest fracture strength. No significant difference was observed between the two main reattachment techniques. However, subgroup analysis revealed significant differences, with the internal dentinal groove combined with a 7th generation bonding agent demonstrating the highest fracture resistance among experimental groups, while the internal groove with 5th generation bonding agent showed the lowest values.Conclusion: Fragment reattachment is a reliable and conservative treatment option, though it does not fully restore the strength of intact teeth. Both reattachment technique and bonding agent significantly influence fracture resistance. The internal dentinal groove technique with a 7th generation bonding agent showed superior performance, highlighting the importance of appropriate technique and material selection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20677824
Primary Topic
Dental Trauma and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Reattachment Techniques and Adhesives: An In Vitro Study

Zalak Jain
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dental Trauma and Treatments
article

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Reattachment Techniques and Adhesives: An In Vitro Study

Zalak Jain
article en

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Traumatic fractures of anterior teeth are common and can adversely affect aesthetics, function, and psychological well being. Fragment reattachment is a conservative treatment modality, and its success largely depends on the reattachment technique and bonding system used.Aim: To evaluate and compare the fracture strength of reattached anterior tooth fragments using external chamfer and internal dentinal groove techniques with 5th and 7th generation bonding agents.Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted maxillary anterior teeth were selected and divided into three groups: external chamfer (n=32), internal dentinal groove (n=32), and control (n=16).Experimental groups were further subdivided based on the bonding agent used. Standardized incisal fractures were created, and fragments were reattached using the respective techniques.Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using SPSS with one way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, and Student's t-test at a significance level of p < 0.05.Results: The control group showed the highest fracture strength. No significant difference was observed between the two main reattachment techniques. However, subgroup analysis revealed significant differences, with the internal dentinal groove combined with a 7th generation bonding agent demonstrating the highest fracture resistance among experimental groups, while the internal groove with 5th generation bonding agent showed the lowest values.Conclusion: Fragment reattachment is a reliable and conservative treatment option, though it does not fully restore the strength of intact teeth. Both reattachment technique and bonding agent significantly influence fracture resistance. The internal dentinal groove technique with a 7th generation bonding agent showed superior performance, highlighting the importance of appropriate technique and material selection.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Dental Trauma and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength Recovery of Reattached Anterior Fractured Tooth Fragment Using Different Reattachment Techniques and Adhesives: An In Vitro Study — Zalak Jain · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS