Exploring hemodynamic measurements from the Tromsø Study for prediction of cardiovascular disease using traditional statistical models and machine learning approaches

Abstract In Norway, NORRISK2 is the government-recommended risk model for predicting an individual’s 10-year probability of getting cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aims to investigate the potential for improvement of CVD prediction by using hemodynamic measurements from a non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitor, taken as part of pain sensitivity assessment with the cold-pressor test (CPT) during the Tromsø6 Study (2007–2008). Using 6694 recordings, ultra-short-term pulse rate variability (PRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) obtained during the CPT were added as additional variables into the existing NORRISK2 survival model (extended model). In addition, the time-series data was used in a machine learning (ML) model without the NORRISK2 background variables. Both models were compared to a recalibration of the original NORRISK2 model. The predictions from the recalibrated NORRISK2 model and the ML model were then combined with logistic regression. The statistical models performed similarly on the test set, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.71–0.86), 0.79 (0.71–0.85) and 0.77 (0.69–0.84) (original, recalibrated and extended NORRISK2, respectively). The ML model using only hemodynamic measurements obtained a test set AUROC of 0.73 (0.67–0.80). Combining the NORRISK2 and ML model did not increase the AUROC. Adding ultra-short-term PRV and BRS derived from Tromsø6 did not improve the prediction of the NORRISK2 model either. Although with lower accuracy, the beat-to-beat time series of hemodynamic variables from a CPT had a significant (p < 0.01) ability to predict future CVD without any other person-specific data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-57003-5
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring hemodynamic measurements from the Tromsø Study for prediction of cardiovascular disease using traditional statistical models and machine learning approaches

Roy Bjørkholt Olsen, Maja‐Lisa Løchen, Henrik Schirmer, Christian Tronstad et al.
Scientific Reports
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Exploring hemodynamic measurements from the Tromsø Study for prediction of cardiovascular disease using traditional statistical models and machine learning approaches

Roy Bjørkholt Olsen, Maja‐Lisa Løchen, Henrik Schirmer, Christian Tronstad, Bjørn-Jostein Singstad, Leiv Arne Rosseland, Naomi Azulay, Audun Stubhaug, Jenssen Tg, Christopher Sivert Nielsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Norway, NORRISK2 is the government-recommended risk model for predicting an individual’s 10-year probability of getting cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aims to investigate the potential for improvement of CVD prediction by using hemodynamic measurements from a non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitor, taken as part of pain sensitivity assessment with the cold-pressor test (CPT) during the Tromsø6 Study (2007–2008). Using 6694 recordings, ultra-short-term pulse rate variability (PRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) obtained during the CPT were added as additional variables into the existing NORRISK2 survival model (extended model). In addition, the time-series data was used in a machine learning (ML) model without the NORRISK2 background variables. Both models were compared to a recalibration of the original NORRISK2 model. The predictions from the recalibrated NORRISK2 model and the ML model were then combined with logistic regression. The statistical models performed similarly on the test set, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.71–0.86), 0.79 (0.71–0.85) and 0.77 (0.69–0.84) (original, recalibrated and extended NORRISK2, respectively). The ML model using only hemodynamic measurements obtained a test set AUROC of 0.73 (0.67–0.80). Combining the NORRISK2 and ML model did not increase the AUROC. Adding ultra-short-term PRV and BRS derived from Tromsø6 did not improve the prediction of the NORRISK2 model either. Although with lower accuracy, the beat-to-beat time series of hemodynamic variables from a CPT had a significant (p < 0.01) ability to predict future CVD without any other person-specific data.

Scientific Reports
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University Hospital of North Norway (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Sykehuset i Vestfold (NO), Sørlandet Hospital Arendal (NO), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.