Upstream Influence of Conical Shock Wave—Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions

Conical shock wave interacting with the boundary layer on a flat plate (Conical SBLI) is a complex three-dimensional phenomenon distinguished by a hyperbolic shock trace and spanwise variation in interaction intensity. This study investigates upstream-influence behavior in a conical shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction using numerical simulations at a Mach number of 2 and a unit Reynolds number of [Formula: see text]. The simulations were performed for cone-half angles ranging from 14–30 deg, and results were validated against existing experimental data. The analysis reveals that the upstream influence length on the symmetry plane scales with the pressure rise, following a power law similar to that observed in two-dimensional (2D) shock wave and boundary layer interactions. Spanwise measurements show that the normal upstream influence length increases along the span, transitioning from cylindrical similarity near the symmetry plane to a conical similarity further outboard. These findings provide new insights into conical shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction, and offer a framework for predicting upstream influence length in practical supersonic flows over conical geometries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066905
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upstream Influence of Conical Shock Wave—Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions

Bikalpa Bomjan Gurung, Amna Khraibut, Krishna M. Talluru, Sudhir L. Gai
AIAA Journal
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Upstream Influence of Conical Shock Wave—Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions

Bikalpa Bomjan Gurung, Amna Khraibut, Krishna M. Talluru, Sudhir L. Gai
article en

Abstract

Conical shock wave interacting with the boundary layer on a flat plate (Conical SBLI) is a complex three-dimensional phenomenon distinguished by a hyperbolic shock trace and spanwise variation in interaction intensity. This study investigates upstream-influence behavior in a conical shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction using numerical simulations at a Mach number of 2 and a unit Reynolds number of [Formula: see text]. The simulations were performed for cone-half angles ranging from 14–30 deg, and results were validated against existing experimental data. The analysis reveals that the upstream influence length on the symmetry plane scales with the pressure rise, following a power law similar to that observed in two-dimensional (2D) shock wave and boundary layer interactions. Spanwise measurements show that the normal upstream influence length increases along the span, transitioning from cylindrical similarity near the symmetry plane to a conical similarity further outboard. These findings provide new insights into conical shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction, and offer a framework for predicting upstream influence length in practical supersonic flows over conical geometries.

AIAA Journal
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT), UNSW Sydney (AU), International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Upstream Influence of Conical Shock Wave—Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions — Bikalpa Bomjan Gurung, Amna Khraibut, et al. · AIAA Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS