Vaccine uptake in the context of mandate announcement and removal: Evidence from Europe and North America

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic drove the implementation of vaccine mandates to protect spaces and/or increase vaccine uptake, though their design, timing, and scope varied across jurisdictions. This study examines the associations of vaccine mandate announcements and removals with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in France, Italy, and California (USA). METHODS: We employed interrupted time series (ITS) analysis using aggregated data from Our World in Data and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. The primary outcomes were the weekly number of first and booster doses per 100,000 people. We estimated changes in the rate and trend of vaccine uptake following policy announcements and removals, adjusting for COVID-19 cases, deaths, and temporal autocorrelation to account for other influencing factors. FINDINGS: Initial mandate announcements were associated with immediate increases in vaccine uptake: 113% (95% CI: 63 to 178%) in Italy, 195% (95% CI: 113 to 308%) in France, and 32% (95% CI: 16 to 51%) in California. However, these associations attenuated in more fully adjusted models, especially in France, where the initial association was no longer statistically significant after controlling for epidemiological conditions and temporal autocorrelation. Mandate removals were more consistently associated with declines in booster uptake in Italy and France, including declines of 62% (95% CI: -74 to -45%) and 70% (95% CI: -79 to -57%), respectively, while partial removal in California coincided with increased booster uptake. CONCLUSION: Vaccine mandate announcements were associated with short-term increases in vaccine uptake during key periods of the pandemic. Their removal was often associated with a slowing in uptake, highlighting the need for coordinated communication strategies to sustain coverage. Future policy responses should consider timing, mandate design, and transition planning in contexts where such policies are used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128825
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vaccine uptake in the context of mandate announcement and removal: Evidence from Europe and North America

Katie Attwell, Hannah; id_orcid 0000-0001-6434-8290 Moore, Mesfin Genie, Frank Beard et al.
Vaccine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Vaccine uptake in the context of mandate announcement and removal: Evidence from Europe and North America

Katie Attwell, Hannah; id_orcid 0000-0001-6434-8290 Moore, Mesfin Genie, Frank Beard, Francesco Paolucci, Aregawi G. Gebremariam, Christopher C. Blyth, Annette Regan, Huong Le, Kristine Macartney
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic drove the implementation of vaccine mandates to protect spaces and/or increase vaccine uptake, though their design, timing, and scope varied across jurisdictions. This study examines the associations of vaccine mandate announcements and removals with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in France, Italy, and California (USA). METHODS: We employed interrupted time series (ITS) analysis using aggregated data from Our World in Data and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. The primary outcomes were the weekly number of first and booster doses per 100,000 people. We estimated changes in the rate and trend of vaccine uptake following policy announcements and removals, adjusting for COVID-19 cases, deaths, and temporal autocorrelation to account for other influencing factors. FINDINGS: Initial mandate announcements were associated with immediate increases in vaccine uptake: 113% (95% CI: 63 to 178%) in Italy, 195% (95% CI: 113 to 308%) in France, and 32% (95% CI: 16 to 51%) in California. However, these associations attenuated in more fully adjusted models, especially in France, where the initial association was no longer statistically significant after controlling for epidemiological conditions and temporal autocorrelation. Mandate removals were more consistently associated with declines in booster uptake in Italy and France, including declines of 62% (95% CI: -74 to -45%) and 70% (95% CI: -79 to -57%), respectively, while partial removal in California coincided with increased booster uptake. CONCLUSION: Vaccine mandate announcements were associated with short-term increases in vaccine uptake during key periods of the pandemic. Their removal was often associated with a slowing in uptake, highlighting the need for coordinated communication strategies to sustain coverage. Future policy responses should consider timing, mandate design, and transition planning in contexts where such policies are used.

VaccineVol. 88
Kaiser Permanente (US), The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (AU), National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance (AU), Pathwest Laboratory Medicine (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.