Evaluating How Scholarly Publishers Disclose Their Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Content Analysis of Publisher Websites

While increasing scholarship has investigated journal policies on how authors must disclose their use of AI, little research has investigated how scholarly publishers disclose their own use of AI within their editorial workflows and beyond. This study undertook a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of the websites of the five largest scholarly publishers, as well as each of their top 20 journals, to better understand how scholarly publishers are practicing AI transparency. The analysis found that most publisher webpages included some information about their use of AI, while only about a quarter of the journal webpages did. Some publishers noted AI restrictions for journal editors, but none mentioned restrictions for other publishing staff. Details in these AI statements were often lacking, and overall, the statements were often hard to find, potentially limiting their ability to help make such AI use transparent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20671837
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating How Scholarly Publishers Disclose Their Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Content Analysis of Publisher Websites

Teresa Schultz
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating How Scholarly Publishers Disclose Their Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Content Analysis of Publisher Websites

Teresa Schultz
article en

Abstract

While increasing scholarship has investigated journal policies on how authors must disclose their use of AI, little research has investigated how scholarly publishers disclose their own use of AI within their editorial workflows and beyond. This study undertook a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of the websites of the five largest scholarly publishers, as well as each of their top 20 journals, to better understand how scholarly publishers are practicing AI transparency. The analysis found that most publisher webpages included some information about their use of AI, while only about a quarter of the journal webpages did. Some publishers noted AI restrictions for journal editors, but none mentioned restrictions for other publishing staff. Details in these AI statements were often lacking, and overall, the statements were often hard to find, potentially limiting their ability to help make such AI use transparent.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating How Scholarly Publishers Disclose Their Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Content Analysis of Publisher Websites — Teresa Schultz · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS