Spring-assisted cranioplasty for sagittal synostosis: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes

PURPOSE: Spring-assisted cranioplasty is an established technique for the correction of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis, yet data on long-term clinical durability and patient-perceived outcomes remain limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term surgical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes following spring-assisted cranioplasty, with a particular focus on the need for secondary cranial surgery and concordance between surgeon- and parent-reported assessments. METHODS: A single-centre cohort study was performed, including consecutive patients with isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated with spring-assisted cranioplasty between April 2010 and September 2015. Patients were followed within a standardized multidisciplinary craniofacial pathway extending into late childhood and adolescence. Long-term outcomes were assessed using reoperation rates, Kaplan-Meier reoperation-free survival analysis, surgeon-reported Whitaker classification, and structured parent-reported satisfaction measures. RESULTS: Ninety-one of the original 100 patients had complete long-term follow-up and were included, with a mean follow-up duration of 10.0 years (range 5-15 years). Nine patients (9.9%) required secondary cranial surgery during follow-up, including four for raised intracranial pressure and five for aesthetic indications. Reoperation-free survival was 90.1% at 10 years, with the median survival not reached. Surgeon-reported outcomes were excellent, with 87.9% classified as Whitaker Class I. Parent-reported satisfaction was high, with 82.4% completely satisfied and unwilling to consider further surgery. CONCLUSION: Spring-assisted cranioplasty for isolated sagittal synostosis provides durable long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes, with a low incidence of secondary cranial surgery and high patient and parent satisfaction when combined with structured multidisciplinary follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child s Nervous System
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-026-07337-2
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spring-assisted cranioplasty for sagittal synostosis: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes

Dulanka Silva, Silvia Schievano, Alessandro Borghi, Amparo Sáenz et al.
Child s Nervous System
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Spring-assisted cranioplasty for sagittal synostosis: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes

Dulanka Silva, Silvia Schievano, Alessandro Borghi, Amparo Sáenz, Juling Ong, David Dunaway, Greg James, Owase Jeelani
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spring-assisted cranioplasty is an established technique for the correction of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis, yet data on long-term clinical durability and patient-perceived outcomes remain limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term surgical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes following spring-assisted cranioplasty, with a particular focus on the need for secondary cranial surgery and concordance between surgeon- and parent-reported assessments. METHODS: A single-centre cohort study was performed, including consecutive patients with isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated with spring-assisted cranioplasty between April 2010 and September 2015. Patients were followed within a standardized multidisciplinary craniofacial pathway extending into late childhood and adolescence. Long-term outcomes were assessed using reoperation rates, Kaplan-Meier reoperation-free survival analysis, surgeon-reported Whitaker classification, and structured parent-reported satisfaction measures. RESULTS: Ninety-one of the original 100 patients had complete long-term follow-up and were included, with a mean follow-up duration of 10.0 years (range 5-15 years). Nine patients (9.9%) required secondary cranial surgery during follow-up, including four for raised intracranial pressure and five for aesthetic indications. Reoperation-free survival was 90.1% at 10 years, with the median survival not reached. Surgeon-reported outcomes were excellent, with 87.9% classified as Whitaker Class I. Parent-reported satisfaction was high, with 82.4% completely satisfied and unwilling to consider further surgery. CONCLUSION: Spring-assisted cranioplasty for isolated sagittal synostosis provides durable long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes, with a low incidence of secondary cranial surgery and high patient and parent satisfaction when combined with structured multidisciplinary follow-up.

Child s Nervous SystemVol. 42(1)
Durham University (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.