SOCIAL STRATIFICATION OF LEXIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

The study explains how lexical choice reflects social identity, profession, age, education, regional belonging, cultural norms, politeness, and digital communication. The vocabulary of any language is not homogeneous: it includes standard words, colloquial units, slang, jargon, professional terminology, dialectal words, euphemisms, borrowings, and digital lexical forms. English and Uzbek both demonstrate a strong connection between vocabulary and society, but the sources and functions of these layers differ. English social lexis is strongly influenced by globalization, youth culture, professional specialization, and internet discourse. Uzbek social lexis is also changing under global influence, but it remains closely connected with national etiquette, kinship terms, respect forms, regional dialects, occupational vocabulary, and Russian-English borrowings. The article uses a qualitative-comparative method. The results show that socially marked vocabulary functions as a marker of group membership, prestige, informality, solidarity, social distance, and cultural identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20666501
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SOCIAL STRATIFICATION OF LEXIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Zafar Allayev, Jaloliddin Meligaliyev
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

SOCIAL STRATIFICATION OF LEXIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Zafar Allayev, Jaloliddin Meligaliyev
article en

Abstract

The study explains how lexical choice reflects social identity, profession, age, education, regional belonging, cultural norms, politeness, and digital communication. The vocabulary of any language is not homogeneous: it includes standard words, colloquial units, slang, jargon, professional terminology, dialectal words, euphemisms, borrowings, and digital lexical forms. English and Uzbek both demonstrate a strong connection between vocabulary and society, but the sources and functions of these layers differ. English social lexis is strongly influenced by globalization, youth culture, professional specialization, and internet discourse. Uzbek social lexis is also changing under global influence, but it remains closely connected with national etiquette, kinship terms, respect forms, regional dialects, occupational vocabulary, and Russian-English borrowings. The article uses a qualitative-comparative method. The results show that socially marked vocabulary functions as a marker of group membership, prestige, informality, solidarity, social distance, and cultural identity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Memphis VA Medical Center (US), Kimyo International University in Tashkent (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SOCIAL STRATIFICATION OF LEXIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES — Zafar Allayev, Jaloliddin Meligaliyev · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS